<span>c. common resources are rival in consumption.
In the tragedy of the commons, William Forster Lloyd presented the example of a common resource being over used and destroyed because for any individual abusing the resource, they gained a benefit while the damage to the resource was paid by everyone.
So let's look at the available options and see what makes sense, or doesn't make sense.
a. people consider the value of resources in the future more than in the present.
* If this were true, the there wouldn't be a tragedy of the commons. So this is an incorrect answer.
b. markets do not account for the presence of property rights.
* The tragedy of the commons doesn't involve property rights. EVERYONE in the community is allowed to use the commons. The problem is irresponsible overuse of the common resource. So this is also an incorrect answer.
c. common resources are rival in consumption.
* This is the correct answer. The concept of Rivalry is where a common resource can not be simultaneous consumed by multiple users, or if the consumption of a resource decreases its utility to another consumer. In the tragedy, if one person grazes (consumes) more than their fair share, the commons gets over grazed and over time stops producing. Each person who's overgrazing does get a tangible short term benefit for doing so, but everyone has to pay the cost.
d. government does not efficiently allocate society's scarce resources.
* This is also a wrong answer. It's true that the commons could be regulated by the government, but then it would no longer be the commons.</span>
Answer:
The price of a U.S. postage stamp has increased approximately <u>63%</u> in terms of Indian rupees and <u>10%</u> in terms of Chinese yuan.
Explanation:
the exchange rate between the US dollar and the Indian rupee:
April 2011 = 45.54 Indian rupees per dollar x $0.41 = 18.67 Indian rupees
April 2016 = 66.16 Indian rupees per dollar x $0.46 = 30.43 Indian rupees
change in Indian rupees = (30.43 - 18.67) / 18.67 = 63%
the exchange rate between the US dollar and the Chinese yuan:
April 2011 = 6.61 Chinese yuan per dollar x $0.41 = 2.71 Chinese yuan
April 2016 = 6.48 Chinese yuan per dollar x $0.46 = 2.98 Chinese yuan
change in Chinese yuan = (2.98 - 2.71) / 2.71 = 10%
Manufacturing overhead= $57,600
Explanation:
To calculate the Conversion costs, we need to use the following formula:
Conversion costs= direct labor + manufacturing overhead
Now, if direct labor is 60% of conversion costs, then:
Conversion costs= direct labor / (1 - 0.4)
Conversion costs= 86,400 / 0.6
Conversion costs= $144,000
Finally, we determine the manufacturing overhead:
Manufacturing overhead= 144,000 - 86,400
Manufacturing overhead= $57,600
Answer:
Mr. Jackson will need to bring a check to closing in the amount of $14,470
Explanation:
The computation of the closing amount is shown below:
= Down payment + title insurance + recording fees + tax proportion fee - = earned money deposit
where,
Down payment = Purchase cost × remaining percentage (100% - 80%)
= $90,000 × 20%
= $18,000
The other values remain same
So, the value would equal to
= $18,000 + $250 + $60 + $430 - $4,000
= $14,470
Answer:
The correct answer is Consumer-generated marketing.
Explanation:
Currently, people spend more time creating content, consuming and informing themselves than seeing the information generated by the brands themselves, even this is the content that has more value and influence for many consumers.
The User Generated Content will continue to be an important component in the marketing strategy, brands are looking for effective and convincing ways to engage and get closer to consumers.