Answer:
Overbreadth Doctrine
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that the resolution was unconstitutional under the First Amendment Overbreadth Doctrine. This doctrine protects against prohibiting behavior that is guaranteed by the constitution, such as freedom of speech. The airport making a "First Amendment-Free Zone" was unconstitutional under this doctrine.
Answer:
The sponsor can file a discharge petition
Explanation:
A discharge petition withholds the committee from further consideration of a bill or resolution. It is a means of bringing a bill to the floor for consideration without any report from the committee.
The sponsor can file a discharge petition to keep the bill from being pigeonholed.
Pigeonhole means not to assign or hear debate on the bill.
<span>When in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the laws of nature and of nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which implement them to the separation. We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal that, they are endowed by their creator with certain unAlienable rights, that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, government are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, that whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute a new government, laying its foundation on such principals and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mandmknd are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. </span>
A <u>democratic government </u>gives citizens the right to directly vote gov't officials into office to represent them.
On the other hand, <u>authoritarian regimes </u>are built from strong central governments with little to no political freedoms for citizens.
So, the primary different between a democratic and authoritarian government is the <em>citizens' political power/freedom</em>.