Answer:
i think the answer is body language
Explanation:
body language is non-verbal
Answer:
Explanation:
World Wide Web (www) has advanced as a major technology since its introduction during the 1980s. In beginning web sites were primarily used only by few number of users to share information related to their academic work. As the user interface evolved over the next coming years with each new version bringing in new frameworks and techniques, it powered web as a hub of technology. Web 1.0, 2.0 and 3.0 brought more dynamic features to the users. Web 1.0 used to describe the web content in static resulting in rigid user experience. Web 2.0 which powered social networking sites became popular developing the web which ultimately served as a platform for people to create and share their own content on the web in the form of blogs, wikis, feeds, tagging systems, user-created publication systems etc. The evolution of web technology began to spread its roots into the major business areas which brought in the requirement for high speed and expanded availability for substantial number of users.
On the other hand, Web 2.0 has also brought some security’s concerns. Mainly the component of client interaction with web, it opened doors to unauthorized actions in the application. In order to provide a rich user experience majority Web 2.0 sites have adopted lightweight user interface code such as asynchronous JavaScript and XML (AJAX). In the Conventional client-server models, many of calls (requests) are handled and processed on the server side. AJAX allows a higher percentage of requests to be processed on the client side. This may give malicious users many options to modify any application code running on a client machine by exploring and testing the application for vulnerabilities.
To overcome this objective, developers should consider installing an appliance at the Internet gateway, which performs real-time code inspection of traffic flowing through the corporate network. High performance and high availability appliances capable of monitoring and acting swiftly to block any suspicious web traffic are paramount. Also, it is very important that developers develop the application with security in mind. Following the coding convention, having the code reviewed, testing the application thoroughly are all part of securing the application in the web.
Explanation:
One of the things I’ve been writing and talking about a lot lately is the fact that solving problems collaboratively is an incremental process. In fact, in my book, Lost at School, I made mention of the fact that the model could just as easily have been called Incremental Problem Solving or Progressive Problem Solving. I thought the collaborative aspect of the model was the most important to emphasize, but that doesn’t mean that the incremental component isn’t almost as crucial. Often people who are new to the model enter the process of resolving a problem as if it’s a one-shot deal. If you have experience in using Plan B, you already know that most problems require more than one visit to Plan B to resolve. In other words, longstanding, complicated problems aren’t likely to be resolved the first time you try to discuss them. There’s a lot of information to be processed before a given problem can be solved. You need to gather information so as to achieve the clearest possible understanding of the kid’s concern or perspective on the problem (for the unfamiliar, that’s called the Empathy step). Then, you need to be clear about and articulate your own concern (that’s the Define the Problem step). Then, you’ll want to brainstorm with the kid so as to consider the array of potential solutions that could be applied to the problem and consider whether each solution truly addresses the concerns of both parties (that’s the Invitation). There’s a good chance you won’t even make it through all three steps of Plan B in the first attempt on a given unsolved problem (nor should you necessarily even try). If Plan B were a “technique,” then disappointment over not making it through all three steps in one conversation would be understandable. But Plan B is not a technique, it’s a process. As I’ve often emphasized, if you only make it through the Empathy step in the first attempt at Plan B on a given problem but you emerge with a clear sense of a kid’s concern or perspective on a problem that’s been causing significant angst or conflict, that’s quite an accomplishment. You’ll get back to the remaining steps at your earliest opportunity. There’s also an excellent chance the first solution you and the kid agree on won’t solve the problem durably. As you may know, this is usually because the original solution wasn’t as realistic and mutually satisfactory as the two parties first thought. But it could also be because the concerns weren’t as clear or simple as it first seemed. If a solution doesn’t stand the test of time, your goal is to figure out why, which means gathering additional information about the concerns of the two parties and why the solution may not be working so well. Plan B should always conclude with both parties agreeing to return to the problem if the solution being agreed upon doesn’t solve the problem durably. So if your enthusiasm for Plan B waned because your first solution didn’t stand the test of time, take heart: that’s not unusual. Many people enter Plan B with great hope, eager to see their new approach to helping a challenging kid pay quick dividends. In fact, Plan B may well pay quick dividends…not necessarily because the problem is yet durably solved, but because of the relationship- and communication-enhancing that occurs. And while the occasional problem – often simple ones – can be resolved with one visit to Plan B, now you know that several repetitions of Plan B may be necessary on each unsolved problem. Thanks for reading.
