All categories

3 years ago

How do i solve this for g(-3)?

Mathematics

1 answer:

Advocard [28]3 years ago

6 0

Answer: g(-3) is 9 .

Step-by-step explanation:

So there are two functions and the first function says that to get the solution x has to be greater than 4 and -3 which is the input is not greater than 4 so you can't use that function to solve for g(-3).

using the second function , it says that x has to be less or equal to 4. And -3 is indeed less than 4 so you have to use the second function to solve for g(-3)

g(x) = -2x + 3 Input -3 and solve

g(-3) = -2(-3) + 3

g(-3) = 6 + 3

g(-3) = 9

You might be interested in

Justify your reasoning

love history [14]

Answer:

Yes

Step-by-step explanation:

You can conclude that ΔGHI is congruent to ΔKJI, because you can see/interpret that there all the angles are congruent with one another, like with vertical angles (∠GIH and ∠KIJ) and alternate interior angles (∠H and ∠J, ∠G and ∠K).

We also know that we have two congruent sides, since it provides the information that line GK bisects line HJ, meaning that they have been split evenly (they have been split, with even/same lengths).

So now we have three congruent angles, and two congruent sides. This is enough to prove that ΔGHI is congruent to ΔKJI,

7 0

2 years ago

If you invest $20,000 in a mutual fund averaging 10% compounded monthly, how long will it take to reach $1 million?

antoniya [11.8K]

Answer:

hutghighriughriughriughrihgrighrighirhgrhrgurhuihghruhgiurhirhiughriughriughurhurhugi

Step-by-step explanation:

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

I dont understand how to answer this question, help please?

kakasveta [241]

It is A. ....... i wish you had a whole chart

8 0

2 years ago

The laws of quantum physics stand to the world of elementary particles in the way that Newton's laws of classical mechanics stan

loris [4]

Answer:

$\huge\fbox\red{ᴀ}\huge\fbox\orange{ⁿ} \huge\fbox\pink{s}\huge\fbox\green{ʷ} \huge\fbox\blue{ᴇ}\huge\fbox\purple{ʳ}\$

"From a quantum perspective, if you observed yourself in a particular new future that was different from your past, expected that reality to occur, and then emotionally embraced the outcome, you'd be-for a moment living in that future reality, & you would be conditioning your body to believe it was in that future in the present moment."

- Dr. Joe Dispenza

Hope it helps

~ʆᵒŕ∂ཇꜱꜹⱽẻⱮë

3 0

2 years ago

Parallelogram R S T U is shown. Diagonals are drawn from point R to point T and from point U to point S and intersect at point V

stiv31 [10]

Answer:

Option C.

Step-by-step explanation:

Given information: RSTU is a parallelogram, Digonals RT and SU intersect each other at point V, UV=(x-3) and VS=(3x-13).

According to the properties of a parallelogram, the diagonals of a parallelogram bisect each other.