All categories

4 years ago

rewrite the fraction as a decimal

Mathematics

2 answers:

aleksklad [387]4 years ago

5 0

Answer:

1.3

Step-by-step explanation:

divide 13 by 10

zhannawk [14.2K]4 years ago

5 0

Answer:

1.3

Step-by-step explanation:

Divide 13 by 10 the answer is 1 remainder 3.

I hope this helps.

You might be interested in

Shanley would like to give $5 gift cards

Serjik [45]

Answer:

$5x + $4y ≤ $120

let x = 10

y = 5

$70 ≤ 120

Step-by-step explanation:

Note that

> means greater than

< means less than

≥ means greater or equal to

≤ means less than or equal to

the total amount Shanley has is $120. She can spend less than this amount or the amount exactly. So, the inequality sign to be used is ≤

$5x + $4y ≤ $120

let x = 10

y = 5

(50) + 20 ≤ 120

$70 ≤ 120

4 0

3 years ago

The length of your classroom is about 3.5 x 10^2 inches. If the hallway is ten times as long as the classroom, what is the lengt

tatuchka [14]

Answer:

3.5x10^3

Step-by-step explanation:

3.5x10^2 = 350

350x10 = 3500

3500 = 3.5x10^3

8 0

3 years ago

(14 plus 42)divided by 7plus4 to the 2power

Liono4ka [1.6K]

Answer:

Given info in numersical form:

(14+42)÷(7+4)²

= 56÷11²

= 56÷(11×11)

= 56÷121

= 0.46

7 0

3 years ago

For each ordered pair (x,y) determine whether it is a solution to the inequality 7x+2y>_26

MA_775_DIABLO [31]

The inequality is given as,

$7x+2y>-26$

Consider that any ordered pair (x,y) is said to be the solution of the inequality if the ordered pair gives a true result when substituted in the inequality.

Consider the ordered pair (4,-9),

$\begin{gathered} 7(4)+2(-9)>-26 \\ 28-18>-26 \\ 10>-26 \end{gathered}$

Clearly, the result is true. So it can be concluded that (4,-9) is a solution of the given inequality.

Therefore, mark YES for the ordered pair (4,-9).

Consider the ordered pair (3,4),

$\begin{gathered} 7(3)+2(4)>-26 \\ 21+8>-26 \\ 29>-26 \end{gathered}$

Clearly, the result is true. So it can be concluded that (3,4) is a solution of the given inequality.

Therefore, mark YES for the ordered pair (3,4).

Consider the ordered pair (-4,0),

$\begin{gathered} 7(-4)+2(0)>-26 \\ -28+0>-26 \\ -28>-26 \end{gathered}$

Clearly, the result is false as -28 is not actually greater than -26.

So it can be concluded that the ordered pair (-4,0) is not a solution of the given inequality.

Therefore, mark NO for the ordered pair (-4,0).

Consider the last ordered pair (-6,8),

$\begin{gathered} 7(-6)+2(8)>-26 \\ -42+16>-26 \\ -26>-26 \end{gathered}$

Note that the numbers on both sides of the inequality are identical. So there should be the symbol of equality, not inequality. So, it can be concluded that this ordered pair (-6,8) is not a solution of the given inequality.

Therefore, mark NO for the ordered pair (-6,8).

4 0

2 years ago

A fashion designer wants to know how many new dresses women buy each year. A sample of 683 women was taken to study their purcha

Ulleksa [173]

The answer is I don’t know sorrry

8 0

3 years ago

​rewrite the fraction as a decimal

rewrite the fraction as a decimal