1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sukhopar [10]
3 years ago
10

Compare Elizabeth I of England and King Philip II of Spain in terms of their personalities as rulers, their relationship to reli

gion, and their foreign policy.
Social Studies
1 answer:
andrey2020 [161]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

King Philip II of Spain was, personality-wise, less cautious than Elizabeth I of England. He sought a more active foreign policy, in part because he had to, since he was not only a king, but the emperor of a huge Spanish Empire that included territories all over the world.

King Philip was a devout catholic who saw himself as a defender of the Pope, and as a leader of the counter-reformation. His anti-protestanism was one of his motivations for invading England in 1588.

Elizabeth I was more reserved, in part because he did not have as much power as Philip II. She was the king of a small island-country, not the empress of a transoceanic empire. She was relatively tolerant of other religiouns while being anglican herself.

She did not had a lot military success until the Anglo-English war when her army defeated the Spanish Armada.

You might be interested in
In a market economy, which of the following is MOST LIKELY to benefit consumers?
cluponka [151]
<h3>Answer: A. competition among producers</h3>

==========================================================

Explanation:

Competition reduces prices while also increasing the quality of the product or service. Companies that don't do such things will likely be out of business since the customer can go elsewhere for a better experience. The more competition, the better consumers are off.

In contrast, monopolies are bad for consumers because one company can set the price to whatever they want (to a certain level of course) and the customer has no choice to pay that price. The customer does not have any other option so the company is in full control. This leads to decline in quality because quality is often associated with cost. Safety standards may decline as well. So this is why monopolies are not good for the customer. In cases where there are monopolies, such as with power utilities, it is strongly advised that government regulations are put in place. This way the company doesn't completely exploit the customer.

In short, we can eliminate choice D because it runs counter to choice A.

Choice C can also be eliminated because if you had a decrease in supply, then the price of the product is likely to go up if you hold other factors in check (such as keeping the same level of demand). Higher prices do not benefit consumers unless those consumers had an equal or better wage increase.

A raise in interest rates means that it becomes more expensive to borrow money. For example, a raise in interest rates means that mortgage rates go higher. This negative is slightly counterbalanced with the fact that savings accounts interest rates go up as well. Overall, I think a rise in interest rates means that consumers ultimately pay more, so we can cross choice B off the list as well.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
By the 1700s, what about slavery had changed?
zloy xaker [14]
The number of black slaves was less. The population as a whole of black slaves grew. A lot of the soil was bad from over-planting so there was less of a demand for slaves thus some would become free.<span />
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is a cotton broker? How did he make money
White raven [17]

Answer:

n Georgia, the midpoint of salaries reported for the position (50th percentile) is $52,344. The 75th percentile (the rate below which 75% of salary data falls) is $80,995. The 25th percentile (the rate below which 25% of the data falls) is $38,900.

In the Pre-Civil War South, most cotton planters relied on cotton factors (also known as cotton brokers) to sell their crops for them.

This factor was usually located in an urban center of commerce, such as Charleston, Mobile, New Orleans, or Savannah (harbor cities; there was not yet a network of railroads), where they could most efficiently tend to business matters for their rural clients. Prior to the American Civil War, the states of Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, and Mississippi were producing more than half of the world's cotton, but Arkansas, Tennessee, and Texas produced large amounts also.[1] At the same time, the port of New Orleans exported the most cotton, followed by the port of Mobile.[2]

Cotton factors also frequently purchased goods for their clients, and even handled shipment of those goods to the clients, among other services.

3 0
3 years ago
People living in the 21st century have a better life quality than people who lived in previous times. To what extent do you agre
slega [8]

It is quite agreeable to a high extent that people living in the 21st century have a better life quality than people who lived in previous times.

<h3>What is the significance of life in 21st century?</h3>

The quality of life in the 21st century is quite better than that in the previous times. This can be stated because the infrastructure has improved a lot in addition to the technological advancements and age of computer that has improved the accessibility and mobility.

Therefore, the significance regarding the life in 21st century has been aforementioned.

Learn more about life in 21st century here:

brainly.com/question/13363504

#SPJ4

8 0
1 year ago
What method of research focuses on the patterns of traits that characterize whole persons
Contact [7]

Answer:

The essential trait approach

Explanation:

  • The trait or quality methodology accept that attributes are steady after some time in an individual, and reliable crosswise over circumstances.  
  • The methodology doesn't endeavor to foresee the conduct of a particular individual. It portrays character, however doesn't endeavor to clarify it the basic components of attributes.  
  • The essential trait methodology endeavors to distinguish the couple of traits or qualities out of thousands, that are genuinely key to seeing the majority of the others. endeavors to catch ways individuals may contrast in kind, not simply degree.
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which european country was later inspired by the declaration of independence?
    13·2 answers
  • Identify a social, environmental, or political problem that is of local, national, or global concern.
    11·1 answer
  • How many members does each state have in the U.S. Senate?
    11·1 answer
  • Do you think it's reasonable to hold law enforcement officers to a higher standard of behavior?
    5·2 answers
  • Which of the following would be counted as an economic trend
    10·1 answer
  • Name the two men who made contributions in architecture.
    9·1 answer
  • Describe the impact that the Black Death had on Europe
    13·1 answer
  • According to a model of widow/widower reactions developed by Bonanno and colleagues, _____ grief is characterized by heightened
    12·1 answer
  • What is the Rostow's stage of Portugal?
    10·1 answer
  • Cómo domina el hombre la vida instintiva
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!