Answer:
I'm from Maryland but I live in Virginia. And I like my family. :)
Answer:
Option E
Explanation:
In simple words, the above case relates to the situation of lack of evidence. For proving an alleged criminal to be the culprit the law requires a full hard core proof after no further questioning regarding guilt of the culprit could be done.
In this case, eye witnesses or video camera recording could have been an aid fr Patty but as she had not presented anything to the court she can do nothing.
Answer:
<h3>Freedom of speech.</h3>
Explanation:
- Freedom of speech is a principal that advocates the freedom of a person to state his/her opinion freely and to impart information and ideas without any restrictions.
- However, in the case of Schenk v. United States, the Supreme Court ruled that the Constitution does not protect a person when "falsely shouting fire in a theater and causing panic" because freedom of speech does not protect speech that has the potential to incite danger and disharmony in the society.
- Therefore, in the case of Schenk v. United States, freedom of speech of First Amendment was limited.
Answer:
Gina exemplifies the attribution style most prone to depression since <em>she feels like she won't have success on written assignments, feels she is not good at sociology and that she is not smart enough. </em>
Explanation:
Depression is a mental disorder characterized by a <em>persistent feeling of sadness and despair</em>, as well as a general loss of interest. It can be fueled if the individual has a negative view of him/herself and constantly puts him/herself down.
In this case, Gina is the most prone to depression since the grade created a negative response on her, on her persona and on her general aspirations. She feels like she won't have success anymore, that she isn't good and that she is not smart enough.
Song cycle ..........................................
