I'm pretty sure it's C) or D) because it seems those make the most sense because providing excitement does not matter if that is not their point, repeating a previous point is practically useless because that point has already been said.
It is real I hoped this help you
Well, ya see, we need to have the picture of the circuit.
True!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Answer:
<u>In physics</u>, efficiency is a measure of how much energy is conserved in a process.
<u>In programming</u>, efficiency is directly linked with the speed of runtime execution for software and algorithmic efficiency.
In this comparison, both meanings try to measure the quality of the processes and have formulas to detect this efficiency.
Both meanings have different formulas to define the measures, Big O notation for programming and percentage of energy output divided by energy input for physics. Furthermore, in physics is not possible to get 100% efficiency, but it is possible for programming to have O(1) of efficiency.
