Answer:
yes
Step-by-step explanation:
If <em>x</em> + 1 is a factor of <em>p(x)</em> = <em>x</em>³ + <em>k</em> <em>x</em>² + <em>x</em> + 6, then by the remainder theorem, we have
<em>p</em> (-1) = (-1)³ + <em>k</em> (-1)² + (-1) + 6 = 0 → <em>k</em> = -4
So we have
<em>p(x)</em> = <em>x</em>³ - 4<em>x</em>² + <em>x</em> + 6
Dividing <em>p(x)</em> by <em>x</em> + 1 (using whatever method you prefer) gives
<em>p(x)</em> / (<em>x</em> + 1) = <em>x</em>² - 5<em>x</em> + 6
Synthetic division, for instance, might go like this:
-1 | 1 -4 1 6
... | -1 5 -6
----------------------------
... | 1 -5 6 0
Next, we have
<em>x</em>² - 5<em>x</em> + 6 = (<em>x</em> - 3) (<em>x</em> - 2)
so that, in addition to <em>x</em> = -1, the other two zeros of <em>p(x)</em> are <em>x</em> = 3 and <em>x</em> = 2
Answer:
2x - 1 = -45.
Step-by-step explanation:
2x - 1 = -45 is the required equation.
x is the number.
Answer: 8/25
Step-by-step explanation: Using the place value chart, we can see that the decimal 0.32 is thirty-two hundredths so we can write 0.32 as 32/100.
Since 32/100 is not in lowest terms, we divide both the numerator and the denominator by 4 and we get the equivalent fraction 8/25.
This means that 0.32 can be written as the fraction 8/25 which is in lowest terms.
