1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
KatRina [158]
3 years ago
7

The base of an exponential model is 1.024. Is the base a growth or decay factor , why or why not?

Mathematics
2 answers:
g100num [7]3 years ago
5 0
<h2>Answer:</h2>

According to the base of the exponential function which is given to us we get that it is the base of a growth factor.

<h2>Step-by-step explanation:</h2>

We know that a exponential function is in general represented by the expression:

                     f(x)=ab^x

where a is the initial amount; a>0

b is the base of the exponential function.

Also, the exponential function is a growth function is b>1

and it represent a decay if 0<b<1

Here we have:

Base i.e. b=1.024>1

Hence, it will represent  a growth function.

PtichkaEL [24]3 years ago
4 0
I think it depends on the depends on what result you are looking for if it is the exponential model used in the problem. In this problem, it does show how someone gets this results. Both the exponential growth and decay can be used in exponential functions.
You might be interested in
Yani buys 4 dozen flyers for $7.25. What is the cost for 12 dozen
zimovet [89]
$21.75

4x3=12

7.25x3=$21.75
6 0
3 years ago
It has been estimated that one million people are added to the world's population every 4.5 days. Use this rate to answer the fo
bekas [8.4K]

Answer:

81 million

Step-by-step explanation:

In one year there is 365 days, if you divide 365/4.5 the answer is 81.1. And every 4.5 days add 1 million people, then you multiply

81.1*1 000 000 = 81 100 000

approaching to the nearest million, 81 million of babies are added each year.

6 0
3 years ago
What is the algebraic representation (rule) of a figure that has been dilated using a scale factor of 2?
Illusion [34]

Answer:

Okay 2

Step-by-step explanation:

Okay since that is that you gotta that 23u172, got it?

5 0
3 years ago
Please help me picture is shown (VERY EASY)
anastassius [24]

Answer:

Adjacent angles

Step-by-step explanation:

These are adjacent because they share a side

8 0
4 years ago
For the rational function f(x)= 5x3-x/2x3 , identify any removable discontinuities.
Ierofanga [76]

Answer:

Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.

Step-by-step explanation:

Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s rece

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • One of Gemma's 5 friends is going to upgrade to a newer device soon. The average cost of their devices will then increase to $66
    10·1 answer
  • What is the solution to the equation 6 x + 2 = 9 x minus 1?
    14·2 answers
  • Write one two sentences explaining the relationship between rate ,ratio and percent
    5·1 answer
  • Describe the shape of the data distribution.
    10·2 answers
  • What's the square root of 1000000
    11·2 answers
  • Plz help me solve this question algebraic expression 64p^4+81q^4
    12·2 answers
  • Which of the following expressions are equivalent to - 4 + (4 + 5)?
    8·1 answer
  • If:
    15·1 answer
  • What is the answer to 8x + 4( 4x - 3) = 4( 6x + 4) - 4
    13·2 answers
  • If x = 3 and y=-2 then -2xy⁴ is?​
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!