It is what is right for the individual. A moral relativist is a person who believes that their claims are not universal and can change from event to event.
Answer:
There is no picture to help us with answering your question.
Explanation:
Answer:
The answer is that <u>Fay is most likely liable for INSIDER TRADING.</u>
Explanation:
Insider trading which is the unfair advantage someone has over others in the purchase of a given securities in the stock market.
This illigal practice affords the individual the opportunity to purchase stocks at a cheaper rate while selling it off at a higher rate after it must have gone public.
In the case of Fay, he is likely liable for insider trading as a result of the prior information he got from Dhani.
Answer:
struck down on the basis of the supremacy clause
Explanation:
The constitutionality of the Florida law in this case will be struck down in court on the basis of supremacy clause. The Supremacy clause is a clause found in Article VI of the United States Constitution that made it clear that the constitution, treaties, and laws of the federal government are considered to be the supreme law and judges in every state of the federation are bound to it even though the laws of the state are contrary to the federal law.