All categories

3 years ago

Ray wants to buy an item worth $500. Which option is the most cost-effective?

2 answers:

5 0

Ray wants to buy an item worth 500$ in the most cost-effective way. Let's study each of the 3 cases and see with option is the best.

In the first option, he'll buy the item at list price with a coupon for $10 off. So he'll buy it at 500-10 =$490.

In the second option, he'll buy a membership for $35 and then get the item at a 15% discount. With a 15% discount, the price of the item will be 500 - (500*0.15) = 500 - 75 = $425. And with the membership price, he'll pay a total of 425 + 35 = $460.

The third option is to buy the item online at a 10% discount and pay $4 for the shipping. At 10% discount, the price of the item will be 500 - (500*0.1) = 500 - 50 = $450. And with cost of the shipping, he'll pay a total of 450+4 = $454.

So if he chooses the first option, he'll pay $490. With the second, he'll pay $460. And finally with the third, he'll pay $454.

So the third option is the most cost-effective, buying the item at $454.

Hope this helps! :)

-BARSIC- [3]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

Buying the item online at a 10% discount and paying $4 extra for shipping

Step-by-step explanation:

You might be interested in

HELP HELP HELP PLS PLS PLS

Sergio [31]

Answer:

In order of the paragraph:

3, isosceles, greater, 3 in

Step-by-step explanation:

The first drop box has to be 3 because if you add up two sides of a triangle, the sum has to be greater than the third side. If two sides are equal, the triangle is isosceles. The third side cannot be 1 since 1+1 is not greater than 3. So the third side must measure 3in.

4 0

2 years ago

If Alejandro walks 3 miles in 43 minutes, then how far will Alejandro walk in 93 minutes?

LiRa [457]

Answer:

he will walk about 8 miles

Step-by-step explanation:

4 0

2 years ago

How much will a person pay for 1.1 pounds of bananas at a price of $1.86 per pound?

pashok25 [27]

Answer:

$2.046

Step-by-step explanation: I think..don't take my word.

8 0

2 years ago

Suppose that a recent article stated that the mean time spent in jail by a first-time convicted burglar is 2.5 years. A study wa

4vir4ik [10]

Using the z-distribution, it is found that since the test statistic is greater than the critical value, it can be concluded that the mean length of jail time has increased.

At the null hypothesis, it is tested if the mean length of jail time is still of 2.5 years, that is:

$H_0: \mu = 2.5$

At the alternative hypothesis, it is tested if it has increased, that is:

$H_1: \mu > 2.5$

We have the standard deviation for the population, thus, the z-distribution is used. The test statistic is given by:

$z = \frac{\overline{x} - \mu}{\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}}$

The parameters are:

$\overline{x}$ is the sample mean.
$\mu$ is the value tested at the null hypothesis.
$\sigma$ is the standard deviation of the sample.
n is the sample size.

For this problem, the values of the parameters are: $\overline{x} = 3, \mu = 2.5, \sigma = 1.5, n = 26$

Hence, the value of the test statistic is:

$z = \frac{\overline{x} - \mu}{\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}}$

$z = \frac{3 - 2.5}{\frac{1.5}{\sqrt{26}}}$

$z = 1.7$

The critical value for a right-tailed test, as we are testing if the mean is greater than a value, with a significance level of 0.05, is of $z^{\ast} = 1.645$

Since the test statistic is greater than the critical value, it can be concluded that the mean length of jail time has increased.

A similar problem is given at brainly.com/question/24166849

5 0

2 years ago

Please help me match this

Setler [38]

4/5=0.8
0.35=7/20
3/8=0.375
0.775=31/40

You could have use a calculator for this but you’re welcome

8 0

3 years ago