Taryn's story is an example of the Fundamental Attribution Error at work, since she blames Randy's mistake on his personality and her own on the situation.
<h3>What is the Fundamental Attribution Error?</h3>
The Fundamental Attribution Error happens when we tend to blame other people's actions on their personality traits or disposition. In Taryn's opinion, Randy is an unreliable person, which she sees as the reason for him to run out of gas.
Notice how biased Taryn is when the same thing happens to her. When she runs out of gas, she does not blame it on her own personality, but on the situation instead. It happened because she was too tired.
With the information above in mind, we can choose option A as the correct answer for this question.
Learn more about the Fundamental Attribution Error here:
brainly.com/question/27995814
#SPJ1
Answer:
The major conflict is related to Pi's fight for survival after he is stranded at sea when the ship that he and his family are travelling to Canada on sinks. To resolve this conflict, he has to face both internal and external challenges. The biggest conflict Pi faces are against the natural environment. Pi also faces terrifying weather conditions that make life at sea unpredictable. Pi describes a storm that ''came on slowly one afternoon. The clouds looked as if they were stumbling along before the wind, frightened. The sea took its cue. It started rising and falling in a manner that made my heart sink.'' The storm destroys the raft and many of the supplies on the lifeboat. He also faces many other challenges, such as being forced to battle the elements, animals, and a carnivorous island while stranded at sea. This links directly to the theme, which is about struggling to survive through difficult odds. The shipwrecked inhabitants of the little lifeboat don’t simply give up: they actively fight against it. Pi abandons his lifelong vegetarianism and eats fish to sustain himself. Orange Juice, the peaceful orangutan, fights ferociously against the hyena. Even the severely wounded zebra battles to stay alive; his slow, painful struggle clearly shows the sheer strength of his life force. As Martel makes clear in his novel, living creatures will often do unexpected, and sometimes heroic things to survive. However, they will also do barbaric things if pressed. The hyena’s treachery and the blind Frenchman’s turn toward cannibalism show just how far creatures will go when faced with the possibility of extinction.
Hope this helped!
(NOTE: Do you mind marking me as Brainliest?)
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Correct answer is:
A. Paine used empirical evidence to support the claim that the Continental Army had performed creditably.
This is a factual information which is used to show that a claim is true or simply to make a fact known.
With this in mind and from the complete question, we can see that Thomas Paine made use of empirical evidence to show and support the claim that the Continental Army had performed creditably.
The monster threatens to hurt Victor's family if he doesn't help him.
