Answer:
Multinational enterprises (MNEs)
Relationship Change as the MNE moves from Globalization 2.0 to Globalization 3.0 operations:
This move means that Indian and Chinese companies would be competing with my local small firm. The MNE may be looking for cheaper prices for my company's products and services, which the Indian and Chinese companies would more efficiently supply it. My firm may be on the precipice of liquidating if this MNE is our major customer. My firm must move fast to become more competitive by differentiating our products and services with better quality and perhaps reduced production costs, to enable it compete more favorably with the Indian and Chinese competitors. Otherwise, we may regard the relationship as nearing its end and prepare for other opportunities with other companies.
Explanation:
Globalization reduces national boundaries by integrating national economies into a globalized economy, thus enabling companies to compete globally for financial resources, goods, and services. When Globalization 1.0 happened, countries were globalized and the world became a global village. When Globalization 2.0 from which the G7 profited largely, companies were globalized. With the current Globalization 3.0, individuals are being globalized, and the highest beneficiaries are Indian and Chinese nationals who appear better prepared to take on the world, garner most of the important resources to themselves, and call the shots from the boardrooms. An example is Microsoft's current CEO, Satya Nadella, who is an Indian-American.
Answer:
Option (b)=112 units of output was produced in 2013
Explanation:
Returns of scale refers to how much output changes given a proportional change in input, where the input changes by a constant factor.
This can be represented by the equation;
Input 2=Constant×Input 1
where;
Input 1=100 units of Labor+50 units of capital=100l+50c
Constant=k
Input 2=112 units of Labor+56 units of capital=112l+56c
Replacing;
112l+56c=k×(100l+50c)
Since k is a common factor which when multiplied by the input 1 labor and capital equals input 2 labor and capital, it can be calculated as;
k=(Input 2 labor units/input 1 labor units)=(Input 2 capital units)/Input 1 capital units)
k=(112l/100l)=(56c/50c)=1.12
To calculate the output for input 2;
Output 2=k×Output 1
where;
Output 1=the output produced by input 1=100 units
k=constant returns=1.12
Output 2=the output produced by input 2=x
Replacing;
x=100×1.12
x=112 units
Output 2=112 units
112 units of output was produced in 2013
In the given scenario above, it is best to respond to the situation even if it is not your task or assigned task to do so. Even if your team member is assigned to that task, it does not mean that you couldn't do it, it is only proper for you to do it because it helps your team member for he or she is busy and because both of you are employees, it is only best to help one another.
Answer:
In 2020, Matt’s gross estate includes $1 million and a marital deduction of $1 million is been allowed for estate tax purposes
Explanation:
Patricia is said to made a gift to Matt her husband in 2010 which is (50% ×$400,000) $200,000 which means marital deduction of an equal amount will be allowed for the gift tax purposes .
Matt’s gross estate also includes $1 million which is (50% ×$2 million) and will as well be offset by a marital deduction of an equal amount which is why the correct statement is:
In 2020, Matt’s gross estate includes $1 million and a marital deduction of $1 million is been allowed for estate tax purposes.
Answer: C) Lisa starts working longer hours after learning that her co-workers earn less than she does for the same work.
Explanation:
The Equity Theory was posited by John Stacey Adams in 1963 and it argued that 2 key components in motivating employees are <em>fairness</em> and <em>equity</em>. This means that employees are more motivated when they feel they have getting the same outputs as their relevant colleagues for the inputs they put in if those inputs are the same as their relevant colleagues as well. If employees have reason to believe that there is no fairness in output, they will adjust their input to match the level of Equity they believe in. This is what Megan did by starting to reduce her productivity in response to not getting the same salary.
Lisa also subscribes to this theory because she saw that she was getting more output for the same amount of input as others. She therefore adjusted her input to be more than theirs so that the output she received would be fairer.