The crowding-out effect implies that restrictive fiscal policy will reduce real interest rates.
<u>Option: D</u>
<u>Explanation:</u>
The crowding out effect is the circumstances where greater interest rates consequences gives output of a decline in private investment expenditure so as to dampen the initial rise in overall investment expenditure. Authorities often embraces a restrictive fiscal-policy approach and raises spending to stimulate economic activity. This contributes to interest-rate rises. Higher interest rates have a impact on private investment choices. A high magnitude of the crowding-out impact can also result in lower economic revenue.
Explanation:
Conversion costs = Direct labor + Factory overhead
7,800,000 = Direct labor + 5,400,000
Direct labor = $2,400,000
First option is the correct option.
I know this much only.
Answer:
A) leveraging new core competencies to improve current market position.
Explanation:
As is given in the scenario, the people that the company Ancho is trying to get are <em>potential customers</em> rather than existing, hence they cannot be said to be building new core competencies <em>to protect and extend current market position</em>. That would have been the case if they were trying to keep those that were already customers to the company.
Ancho cannot also be said to be <em>redeploying existing core competencies to compete in future markets </em>because they are actually acquiring new competencies in electric car manufacturing which was not their original line of business.
There is also no case of <em>unlearning existing core competencies </em>because Anchor has deployed existing competencies in developing a hybrid car rather than just an electric one.
Hence Anchor is trying to get new customers while keeping the old ones and has made a car that will appeal to both existing and potential customers to improve current market position.
It should be Option B since entrepreneurs main aim is usually profit making.
Answer:
Cumulative voting
Explanation:
Cumulative voting - in this type of voting system sole right is given to shareholder who is in minority to elect their director. this system permit shareholder to cast all their vote for any single nominee for board of directors.
while in regular voting system no permission is granted to anyone to cast more than one vote.
example - for four member and 500 holding share , maximum vote than can cast is 500 (one vote for one share) in normal voting but in cumulative maximum that can cast is 2000 votes
