I believe the Monroe doctrine did not state number 3.
People we support should not be included in learning and taking part in the emergency preparedness plan- false.
people we support should be included in learning and taking part in emergency preparedness plan because the best way to prepare for disaster is to be with family and friends.
Being ready can lessen the stress, loss, and fear that come with disasters. Families, communities, and people all need to be aware of what to do in the event of a fire and where to go for safety during a severe storm. They ought to be prepared to leave their houses, seek safety in public shelters, and take care of their most basic medical requirements.
to learn more about emergency preparedness here
brainly.com/question/17750026
#SPJ4
It is morally impermissible to treat people differently unless there are factual differences between them.
Factual differences. The possibility that the facts with respect to which this Agreement is entered into may differ from the facts that each Party currently knows or believes to be true is recognized and accepted by each of the Parties. The Parties concur that any such discrepancies in reality will not cause the termination or revocation of this Agreement, which shall remain in full force and effect.
If there is a disagreement regarding the interpretation, application, operation, or any alleged violation of the Agreement between the Employer and any employee(s), or between the Employer and the Union, the employee(s) shall continue to work in accordance with the Agreement until the disagreement is resolved.
Learn more about Factual differences here
brainly.com/question/21864490
#SPJ4
When quantity supplied is greater than quantity demand, the condition that needed for the price to reach equilibrium would be: The price of the product will decrease to meet equilibrium.
Answer: Assembly-line justice.
Explanation:
There is relatively little research testing for racial discrimination in the sentencing of individuals convicted of misdemeanor offenses. Because the lower courts where misdemeanor cases are handled usually have huge caseloads and informal, nonadversarial procedures for delivering what is often referred to as <u>assembly-line justice</u>, one might predict that the likelihood of racially disparate decisions would be even greater in these courts than in the more formal felony courts.
<u>Assembly-line justice</u> is a system of justice in which where we find an static process that does not distinguish any kind of contemplations on a regular case to case basis, as a consequence of this, all cases end up being sorted out the same way.
