<span>Overgeneralized beliefs about a group of people that often underline prejudicial emotions are called "stereotypes".
A stereotype refers to a settled, over summed up conviction about a specific gathering or class of individuals.
One advantage of a stereotype is that it empowers us to react quickly to circumstances since we may have had a comparative ordeal previously. One disadvantage is that it influences us to overlook contrasts between people; consequently we ponder individuals that won't not be valid.</span>
Answer:
Explanation:
Issue: Can an institution of higher learning use race as a factor when making admissions decisions?
Result: The Court held that universities may use race as part of an admissions process so long as "fixed quotas" are not used. The Court determined that the specific system in place at the University of California Medical School was "unnecessary" to achieve the goal of creating a diverse student body and was merely a "fixed quota" and therefore, was unconstitutional.
Importance: The decision started a line of cases in which the Court upheld affirmative action programs. In 2003, such academic affirmative action programs were again directly challenged in Gratz v. Bollinger and Grutter v. Bollinger. In these cases, the Court clarified that admission programs that include race as a factor can pass constitutional muster so long as the policy is narrowly tailored and does not create an automatic preference based on race. The Court asserted that a system that created an automatic race-based preference would in fact violate the Equal Protection Clause.
On May 11, 1846, President James Polk updated Congress on recent events concerning Texas. The emissary he sent to Mexico with an offer of cash in exchange for disputed lands was rudely rebuffed. Then, Mexicans opened fire on Americans at the Rio Grande River, killing 16. "War exists," Polk declared.
Answer:
1. Personalized.
2. Socialized.
Explanation:
This is because, according to Howell, unethical charismatic leader focuses on personal goals, values and belief, rather than organizational goals, while the ethical charismatic leader focuses on satisfying the organizational and their followers' goals.
Hence, based on research by Howell, unethical charismatic leaders are also called PERSONALIZED, while ethical charismatic leaders are also called SOCIALIZED.
