The league of nations held a conference for disarmament. The members were Great Britain, France, Italy, and Japan.
To prevent future nation-state wars, moral disarmament intended to promote worldwide collaboration and understanding. The League of Nations conducted a disarmament conference in Geneva, Switzerland, to aid in the disarmament project. The Disarmament Conference aimed to ensure the independence of several nations while reducing a nation's arsenal of offensive weapons. Great Britain, France, Italy, and Japan were the first four permanent members of the League of Nations, and the Assembly also chose four non-permanent members for terms of three years.
In the 1920s, the League of Nations stopped minor wars and improved lives in little ways. But it was unable to uphold the Treaty of Versailles, secure disarmament, or convince strong nations to put an end to hostilities. In addition, as a global organization was established during the 1919 Paris Peace Conference. The League's objectives included disarmament, preventing war through global security, resolving international conflicts by diplomatic discussion, and enhancing human welfare.
Read more about the league of nations on:
brainly.com/question/15322225
#SPJ4
Answer:
i would say opportunity cost
Explanation:
I DON'T KNOW ANYTHING REGARDING ECONOMICS SO DON'T TRUST ME 100% I WAS DRAWN BY TAE PFP
but it was an opportunity and value means cost??
Answer:
what is a gender based violence
Option C is correct. United States uses the adversarial system in its courts. The opposing attorneys have responsibility for controlling presentation of lawsuit. Attorneys may not lie but have no duty to volunteer facts that don't support their client's case.
An impartial individual or group of people, typically a judge or jury, who try to ascertain the truth and pass judgement in accordance with it, is presented with two advocates presenting their parties' case or position under the adversarial system, also known as the adversary system, in common law countries.
Because it leaves less room for the state to be prejudiced against the defendant, advocates of the adversarial system frequently claim that it is more equitable and less prone to misuse than the inquisitional approach.
To know more about Adversarial system:
brainly.com/question/5921518
#SPJ1
Answer:
wow that is a lot to take in all at once all tho if you want i can explain it then u can answer it cool let me know
Explanation:
