1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
MatroZZZ [7]
3 years ago
6

You (an officer) arrive at the scene of a reported shooting. You observe an individual lying face down across the threshold. The

individual appears to be unconscious. He is bleeding from what appears to be a gunshot wound in his right side. You investigate and find a shotgun tied to a chair, and a rope tied from the trigger device of the shotgun to the open door. Your investigation reveals that this was a device to deter burglars.
a. Is the owner justified in using this level of force to prevent the consequences of theft?
b. If so, under what authority? If not, why not?
c. Is the owner justified in using force or the threat of force in this manner?
d. If so, under what authority? If not, why not?
Law
1 answer:
luda_lava [24]3 years ago
8 0

Answer: 1 its on the owners property i think it would be considerd "self defense".

not because it was on his property and it was perfectly legal if the thief was on his thier property trespassing.

You might be interested in
.Which level of government regulates interstate commerce?
omeli [17]

Answer:

The Commerce Clause (Art. I, §8, cl. 3) of the United States Constitution provides that the Congress shall have the power to regulate interstate and foreign commerce. The plain meaning of this language might indicate a limited power to regulate commercial trade between persons in one state and persons outside of that state.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
If the mother has full custody and the son doesn't want to leave dad, can he be forced?
rewona [7]
I believe if the are underange he may be forced unless certain situations things like joint custody might come into play. joint physical custody is where a court orders a child to spend a substantial amount of time with both parents during the course of the year. Second, joint legal custody is where, although one parent may have full physical custody, both parents must agree on any decisions that impact the child, such as their education, medical care and spiritual matters. Lastly, both joint physical and legal custody is a combination of the first two. IT IS ULTIMATELY up to the court to decide whether any type of joint custody is in the best interests of a child. If not, the parent with primary custodial rights over a child will get to decide what kind of visitation for the other parent is fair and reasonable. In many situations, this works out well for both parents and they can often come to an amicable arrangement regarding visitation hours and days.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Be sure to answer at least one, or both, of the questions below in your response to the prompt. Explain your reasoning so that y
givi [52]

Answer:

free badge

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Why does it help o differenciate between self-esteem,self-image and self value?
alex41 [277]

Answer:

self value is what you think you are worth basically how much you think of yourself

self image is how you take care of yourself and how you look

self esteem is the confidence that you have for yourself

3 0
4 years ago
What is the difference between original and appellate jurisdiction
Morgarella [4.7K]

Answer:

The difference is that the original jurisdiction is where the case begins and the appellate jurisdiction is when the court reviews another court's decision.

Explanation:

Original jurisdiction refers to the right of the court to hear the case first and appellate jurisdiction refers to the right of a higher court to review a court's decision.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Janet, a twenty year old women, applied for a position driving a truck for Federal Trucking Inc. Janet, who is 5'4" tall and wei
    12·1 answer
  • The belief that a state had the right to nullify federal laws. True or False
    8·1 answer
  • Which crime is classified as a misdemeanor?<br> O assault<br> O burglary<br> O murder<br> O speeding
    13·2 answers
  • Which of the following individual is NOT considered a U.S. citizen?
    12·1 answer
  • 1. What is a contract?
    12·1 answer
  • People living on rivers in Canada are entitled to have the water come to them in undiminished quality and quantity. This is an e
    10·2 answers
  • Cuales son los elementos esenciales del delito?
    12·1 answer
  • according to the text, what percent of respondents admitted to actually committing an unethical or illegal act in the past year?
    8·1 answer
  • Who should you contact if you have trouble making payments.
    8·1 answer
  • What does it mean to become a partner in a law firm.
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!