1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
MatroZZZ [7]
2 years ago
6

You (an officer) arrive at the scene of a reported shooting. You observe an individual lying face down across the threshold. The

individual appears to be unconscious. He is bleeding from what appears to be a gunshot wound in his right side. You investigate and find a shotgun tied to a chair, and a rope tied from the trigger device of the shotgun to the open door. Your investigation reveals that this was a device to deter burglars.
a. Is the owner justified in using this level of force to prevent the consequences of theft?
b. If so, under what authority? If not, why not?
c. Is the owner justified in using force or the threat of force in this manner?
d. If so, under what authority? If not, why not?
Law
1 answer:
luda_lava [24]2 years ago
8 0

Answer: 1 its on the owners property i think it would be considerd "self defense".

not because it was on his property and it was perfectly legal if the thief was on his thier property trespassing.

You might be interested in
Mayonnaise on an escalator its going ups stairs so see ya later
Tcecarenko [31]

Answer:

okkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk

5 0
3 years ago
Who has chegg please answer i need answers​
sukhopar [10]

Answer:

What?

I need answers

5 0
3 years ago
What did the Supreme Court rule in Baker v Carr ?.
Tanya [424]

The United States Supreme Court ruled in Baker v. Carr (1962) held federal courts could review claims that a state's redistricting of electoral lines violates the Equal 14th Amendment Amendment to the Constitution.

About Equal Protection Clause

The United States Constitution's Fourteenth Amendment's first section contains the Equal Protection Clause. The article states that "neither shall any state deny to any individual within its authority the equal protection of laws." It came into force in 1868. It demands that the law treat people equally who are in similar circumstances.  Civil Rights Act of 1866's equality provisions were a major driving force behind the inclusion of this paragraph.

To know more about Baker v. Carr:

brainly.com/question/29398317

#SPJ4

4 0
1 year ago
All of the following statements about cooperative federalism are TRUE except:
kumpel [21]
The answer to this question will be D
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST!!! 100 POINTS ON THE LINE!!!!
Karo-lina-s [1.5K]

Answer:

This article shall take effect two years after the date of ratification. ... Women are still disproportionately poor, suffer from widespread ... opposed equal pay laws and minimum wage increase measures, opposed paid sick

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Beethoven lost his hearing but continued to write music by doing what?
    9·1 answer
  • In order to help support the commanders' decision-making process, the staff must understand the commanders' information needs. W
    13·1 answer
  • Go to the internet -Please include a reference in the discussion post of your case!
    7·1 answer
  • This is the power of a court to review a law or an official act of a government employee or agent for constitutionality or for t
    15·2 answers
  • What would happen if you fake a credit card number online on a website.
    11·1 answer
  • We the people of the United States, in Order to form a more
    11·1 answer
  • How can you drop two eggs the fewest amount of times, without them breaking?
    15·2 answers
  • What position was Marshall appointed to by President Eisenhower years after this case?
    12·1 answer
  • RIGHT ANSWERS ONLY PLS
    5·1 answer
  • Name some poetic device used in my mother at sixty six by Kamala Das. 1970 ​
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!