It would be D for this question as it said to avoid southern foods, and yet in the next part, it contradicts itself by stating southerners are conservative. A negative leading into a positive. That’s not logical.
Answer: The people portrayed in Fahrenheit 451 have been so brainwashed and filled with propaganda that they will believe anything as long as they are convinced properly. All they care for is their own happiness and pleasure, and they fulfill this to the point of callousness towards others. If they run over someone, to them it’s just another thing to laugh at. With a totalitarian government, they don’t have to worry about the stress of government or war or such things, and the leaders are allowed to choose what they tell their citizens to keep them happy and ignorant. If the citizens knew too much, they could form an uprising and demand equality, which would break the governments happy, mindless nation.
Explanation:
Answer:
C. "She should quote the second sentence directly, because it establishes important supporting evidence in a unique way."
Explanation:
I think this one is correct, however I am not positive, it's really just a guess. The first sentence is common knowledge and you shouldn't need to add what the readers already know if it's the main idea. The second sentence isn't necessarily common knowledge and should always be cited.
Hope this helped, let me know if it's right or not.
The correct punctuation of the sentence is, (It seemed to take forever, to roundup all of the escapees.)
<h3>What is punctuation mark?</h3>
Punctuation is the symbol that is used in English to create a meaning to a sentence when read by a reader.
The punctuation marks used in the given sentence are:
- full stop (.) or period and
Learn more about comma here:
brainly.com/question/14588824
#SPJ1
Rikki tells Nagaina that he is not going to spare her egg and he will kill her.