Term used for a situation in which paired-choice voting by majority rule fails to produce a consistent ranking of society's preferences for public goods is the paradox of voting.
The paradox of voting, also known as Downs' paradox, states that the costs of voting usually outweigh the expected benefits for a rational, self-interested voter. Because the likelihood of exercising the pivotal vote is negligible in comparison to any reasonable estimate of the private individual benefits of the various possible outcomes, the expected benefits of voting outweigh the costs.
Responses to the paradox of voting have included the belief that voters vote to express their preference for a candidate rather than to influence the outcome of the election, that voters exercise some altruism, or that the paradox ignores the collateral benefits associated with voting that are not related to the resulting electoral outcome.
Learn more about paradox of voting here:
brainly.com/question/17136492
#SPJ4
Answer:
I think the first one cause it kinda makes more sense
The main focus of Chiang Kai-shek’s rule was battling communism in the country and is denoted as option C.
<h3>Who was Chiang Kai-shek?</h3>
This was a politician who ruled as the military leader of the Republic of China from 1928 to 1949.
His rule saw communism being battled in the country through various reform programmes he carried out.
Read more about Chiang Kai-shek here brainly.com/question/13654555
#SPJ1
Spearman would have supported the notion that intelligence resulted from a single ability and could be represented by a single test score.
