All categories

3 years ago

At the end of 19th century what country won control of south africa in the boer wars

Social Studies

1 answer:

stich3 [128]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

Great Britain

Explanation:

In Pretoria, representatives of Great Britain and the Boer states sign the Treaty of Vereeniging, officially ending the three-and-a-half-year South African Boer War. The Boers, also known as Afrikaners, were the descendants of the original Dutch settlers of southern Africa.

You might be interested in

Nancy, aged 70, has a vacant plot adjacent to her house that she intends to bequeath to her grandson Roy upon her death. However

adelina 88 [10]

Answer:

Yes, the government can take her property.

Explanation:

The government can take Nancy's property because it has eminent domain over the property. In other words, it means that the government can take private property and make it a public giving the owner compensation for the land. Besides, there has to be a public purpose for the eminent domain over the plot; which, could be the construction of roads, railroads, or public buildings.

5 0

3 years ago

The great schism is known for being a split between what two churches

Neko [114]

Answer:

C. The Orthodox and the Catholics

Explanation:

During the 11th century, the two ideologies of Christianity separated. This event is called The Great Schism or East-West Schism. The Greek Eastern ideas transformed into the Eastern Orthodox Church, while the Latin West became the Roman Catholic Church.

It is derived from long-term divisions, both cultural, linguistic, and social. Some of the main points of the dispute were:

the procession of Holy Spirit – this was the biggest division, as it comes from the understanding of the faith and dogmas. While Eastern Christianity believes that the Father is the one from whom the Son is born and Spirit proceeded, the Latin Churches started teaching that the Holy Spirit proceeds both from father and the Son (Filioque)
the bread used during the Eucharist – the west thought it acceptable to sued unleavened for the communion sacrament, while the eastern did not.
Universal jurisdiction of the Bishop of Rome – Rome believed in the overall authority of the pope, while the eastern church did not think there should be the authority over patriarch.

Celibacy of the clerics – the western church supports the belief that the celibacy of the clerics Is mandatory, while the east found it norm only for the bishops, and not for the priesthood.

4 0

3 years ago

Pa answer po naka erase ko po yung letter b

garri49 [273]

Answer:

d po sagot ko

Explanation:

nonsense report

8 0

3 years ago

Both websites have extensive materials to let you sharpen your understanding of the Watergate scandal and its implications, so y

Sunny_sXe [5.5K]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although the links to the websites are not attached to explore them. However, we can comment on the following.

Two people were key parts of the development of the story of the Watergate Scandal. I am referring to the Washington Post journalists Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein.

Both reporters became too interested in the events of June 1972, that kept on investigating and reporting information until they revealed that United States President Richard Nixon had connections with that event, when burglars were arrested bu the police, when they were robbing documents form the Democratic National Committee headquarters, in Washington D.C.

These two brave journalists end up winning the Pulitzer Price in 1973 for their coverage. They documented all their experiences in the best seller books "All the President's Men" and "The Final Days."

That is why I think the life and actions of the two reporters illuminate important aspects of the Watergate scandal.

5 0

3 years ago

Moral subjectivists claim that value judgments merely express

Stels [109]

Moral subjectivists claim that value judgments merely express subjective opinion.

Explanation:

Subjectivism is the belief that moral evaluations hardly declare or expose the passions or favorites of the orator. Subjectivist is not in the place to provide inferences for one's opinion regarding ethical demands. Subjective things depend on your thoughts and views, there isn't any general fact.

If subjectivism is correct, suddenly "force gain true". Facts are objective, but ideas are subjective. Our sentiments solely reveal internal or subjective acknowledgments to things and that they do not correlate us to an objective or stable root of a value.

3 0

3 years ago