Dude why did you put this question like 5 times??
Answer:
+$183,000
$0
+$183,000
Explanation:
Total assets increased by ($298,000 - $115,000) $183,000.
Total liabilities has no change
Total shareholder equity increased by ($298,000 - $115,000) $183,000.
Some producers are forced to sell their products at the prevailing market price because of (C) a high degree of similarity to competitor's products.
<h3>
What is the prevailing market price?</h3>
- Prevailing Market Price refers to the market's published wholesale price and, in the absence of a declared wholesale price, the prevailing market price of any commodities.
- The term "prevailing market conditions" refers to the average amount of rent paid by operators of similar sized and placed lodges throughout the country, as determined in good faith by the national protected area authority.
- Because of their great degree of similarity to competitors' products, some producers are forced to offer their items at the prevailing market price.
- The average wage paid to similarly employed workers in a certain occupation in the area of anticipated employment is described as the prevailing wage rate.
Therefore, some producers are forced to sell their products at the prevailing market price because of (C) a high degree of similarity to competitors' products.
Know more about market prices here:
brainly.com/question/24877850
#SPJ4
The complete question is given below:
Why are some producers forced to sell their products at the prevailing market price?
A. price takers find market analysis is too costly
B. they are very small players in the overall market
C. high degree of similarity to competitor's products
D. they can increase output without affecting the quality
Answer: $170,000
Explanation:
According to the historical cost concept, the original cost value of a asset (i.e. land) should be recorded in the books. The original cost refers to the cost of a asset at the time of purchasing. As per the principle of historical cost, assets are always recorded as a original cost or historical cost or acquisition cost.
But when a person sold the asset then he will consider the fair market value.
<span>I this case, the loan is still valid and at that point Mike would be responsible for finding a way to pay the loan back as agreed upon in the contract. This is called co-signing, when two parties both sign for a loan together. Both parties are responsible for the loan and even though David cannot be found, the loan must still be paid and Mike would be held responsible for this.</span>
