Answer:
Courtney's walking speed = 3.33mph
Brandi's walking speed = 4.33 mph
Step-by-step explanation:
Let x = Courtney's walking speed
then
(x + 1) = Brandi's walking speed
:
Time = Distance/speed
Brandi walks 6.5 mi time = Courtney walks 5 mi time
6.5/x + 1 = 5/x
Cross multiply
6.5x= 5(x+1)
6.5x= 5x + 5
6.5x - 5x = 5
1.5x = 5
x = 5/1.5
x = 3.33 mph is Courtney's walking speed
Note that:
(x + 1) = Brandi's walking speed
3.33mph + 1 = 4.33mph
Therefore,
Courtney's walking speed = 3.33mph
Brandi's walking speed = 4.33 mph
Answer:
7
Step-by-step explanation:
as it does that F thing where its equal to it....
Answer:
See Explanation
Step-by-step explanation:
Given



Required
Represent them on number line
Start by getting the LCM of the denominators of the three fractions;
The denominator are: 3 and 5

This means that, the number line will be divided into 15 partitions;
Next, we get the position of each fraction as follows;



<em>Jean will be represented on the 10th point</em>



<em></em>
<em>Terry will be represented on the 5th point</em>
<em></em>



<em>Steve will be represented on the 3rd point</em>
<em></em>
<em>See Attachment for number line</em>
Answer:
We have sufficient evidence to conclude at α = .05 that the husband’s perception would be higher than the wife’s.
Step-by-step explanation:
The hypotheses testing procedure in the given scenario is
H0: Husband’s perception would be similar to the wife’s i.e. μh=μw
Ha: Husband’s perception would be higher than the wife’s i.e. μh>μw
Level of significance: α=0.05
Test statistic: t=2.776
Critical region: t>t(0.05,9)=1.833
Conclusion: As the calculated value of t lies in critical region, so we reject our null hypothesis at 0.05 level of significance. Thus, we have sufficient evidence to conclude at α = .05 that the husband’s perception would be higher than the wife’s.
Answer:
i think you got it wrong because you were just supposed to multiply 34 times 2.5 and get 8.5