Answer:
access to end consumers
Explanation:
Handling the supply chain relates to handling the day-to-day operations related to the product and services.
The goal is to turn the raw material into the finished products by going through the process work cycle so that the product is ready to be sold and shipped to the consumer with prescribed time and exact location.
In turn, it also focuses on achieving a competitive advantage and improving client satisfaction.
At the beginning of the supply chain, they less focus to the end consumers.
Sue works as a salesperson in a clothing store. She earns $7.25 per hour plus COMMISSION, which is based on her sales revenue.
Types of Sales Commissions:
1) Gross profit commission - based on gross profit (sales - cost)
2) Revenue Commission ⇒ Sue's commission
3) Placement Fees - fixed amount on every unit sold
4) Revenue Gates - based on performance
Answer:
D. optional sinking fund deposits
Explanation:
The revenue bond rate convenants needed that the rate should be set for the level that could be enough for covering a facility operation and maintenance also the debt service cost is considered
But there is no requirement to cover the option sinking fund or the deposit with respect to the reserve fund
Therefore according to the given case, the option D should be chosen
Answer:
19%
Explanation:
Margin of safety = (Current sales - Break even sales) / Current sales * 100
= (10,000 - 8,100) /10,000 *100
= 1,900 / 10,000 * 100
= 19%
Answer:
The appellate court did not rule in favor of Hall. Instead, it upheld the lower court's rulings. When Hall appealed up to the Supreme Court, the highest court affirmed Hall's conviction and sentencing.
This shows that there was no violation of the Fourth Amendment in Hall's case. In addition, the prosecution established the existence of probable cause in the absence of a valid warrant to search and obtain evidence that would establish the case against Terrence Hall, leading to his eventual conviction.
Explanation:
Although, the Fourth Amendment of the US Constitution protects an individual from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government, it does not guarantee against all searches and seizures. It only guarantees against searches and seizures that are regarded as legally unreasonable. This implies that there may be probable cause for searches and seizures.
