1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vladimir2022 [97]
2 years ago
15

Debbie Brooks and Martha Tingstrom lived together. Tingstrom handled their finances. For five years, Brooks did not look at any

statements concerning her accounts. When she finally reviewed the statements, she discovered that Tingstrom had taken $85,500 from Brooks's checking account with Transamerica Financial Advisors. Tingstrom had forged Brooks's name on several checks paid between one and two years earlier. Another year passed before Brooks filed a suit against Transamerica. Who is most likely to suffer the loss for the checks paid with Brooks's forged signature? Why?
Business
2 answers:
sergiy2304 [10]2 years ago
6 0

Answer: Debbie Brooks is most likely to suffer the loss because she allowed Martha Tingstrom to handle her financial resources and accounts which in itself is a mistake.

This is a case of forgery which is defined as the act of forging, fabricating, or producing falsely especially the crime of fraudulently making or altering a writing or signature purporting to be made by another, the false making or material alteration of or addition to a written instrument for the purpose of deceit and fraud.

GaryK [48]2 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Forgery refers to the crime pertaining to, alternation of legal obligation or rights in writing of another person. It is the production of the spurious work which is being considered to be genuine such as a painting, and coin. It is the action underlying imitation or forging a copy of the document, banknote, work of art and signature.

In the case, Debbie Brooks is solely responsible for the loss caused to her by the forged transaction. The fraud took place due to the recklessness of Debbie Brooks as she allowed Martha Tingstrom to handle her financial resources and accounts which in itself is a mistake. She failed to notice the transaction details promptly issued to her periodically  by her bank and provided the details of such transaction to the bank within a period of 30 days. The bank is not liable as it has perform its obligation to the fullest. Therefore, it is ascertained that Debbie Brooks is solely responsible for the loss caused to her by the forged transaction made by Martha Tingstrom.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
When teaching new vocabulary, how many times should you encourage the student to repeat the word back to you?
hram777 [196]
Answer:  Repeat little and often. It's alarming how quickly students can forget vocabulary. Encouraging students to focus on new vocabulary daily is the best way to make it stick. It doesn't have to involve sitting down for hours; little and often will help get vocabulary into students long term memory.
3 0
3 years ago
Power Drive Corporation designs and produces a line of golf equipment and golf apparel. Power Drive has 100,000 shares of common
malfutka [58]

Solution:

Power Drive Corporation has the following beginning balances in its stockholders’ equity accounts on January 1, 2012:  

Common Stock, $100,000;  

Additional Paid-in Capital - common stock    $4,830,000;  

Retained Earnings,  $2,520,000.  

March 1 Issues 55,500 additional shares of $1 par value common stock for $67 per share.

Dr Cash 3,718,500

Cr Common stock 55,500

Cr Paid-in Capital 3,663,000

At this point there are 175,500 common shares outstanding

May 10 Repurchases 11,000 shares of treasury stock for $89 per share.

Dr Treasury stock 979,000

Cr Cash 979,000

At this point there are 164,500 common shares outstanding

June 1 Declares a cash dividend of $1.50 per share to all stockholders of record on June 15.  

Dr Cash dividend 246,750 (164,500 x $1.50)

Cr Dividend payable 246,750

July 1 Pays the cash dividend declared on June 1.

Dr Dividend payable 246,750

Cr CAsh 246,750

October 21 Reissues 3,000 shares of treasury stock purchased on May 10 for $95 per share.

Dr Cash 285,000

Cr Treasury stock 267,000 (3,000 x cost of $89)

Cr Additional paid-in capital - treasury stock 18,000

At this point there are 167,500 common shares outstanding   Stockholders' equity

Common stock - 175,500 shares of $1 par issued, 167,500 outstanding $175,500

Additional paid-in capital - common stock $8,493,000

Additional paid-in capital - treasury stock $18,000

retained earnings $2,803,250

less Treasury stock (8,000 shares) $712,000

Stockholders' equity $10,777,750

4 0
2 years ago
ERIC: Hi, Hubert. This is my first economics course, and many of the concepts discussed in class are really confusing. Today the
Ymorist [56]

Answer:

ERIC: Hi, Hubert. This is my first economics course, and many of the concepts discussed in class are really confusing. Today the professor explained that the true cost of going to college includes both the tuition I pay as well as something called the "opportunity cost" of going to college. I don't understand. I pay $32,000 per year in tuition. The tuition is what I pay to the school, so it seems like that should be my true cost!

HUBERT: Hi, Eric. Many concepts in economics can be confusing at first. Let's talk it through.

Economists think of costs a bit differently than just the dollar amount that you pay. To an economist, the true cost of college includes the total value of what you give up in order to acquire your college education. In other words, not only did you give up the tuition money that you paid, but by attending college, you gave up opportunities to do other things with your time as well. This is where the idea of opportunity cost comes from.

The opportunity cost of your decision to go to college is the value of the next best alternative that you gave up. Suppose that your next best alternative to college is to work as a cashier. By not going to college, and taking this job, you could earn $16,000 per year. Then your opportunity cost of college is <u>$16,000</u>, and your total cost of a year of college is <u>$48,000</u> per year.

ERIC: I think I get it now. So when I take into account the opportunity cost of college, the true cost is actually <u>more </u>than just the tuition.

HUBERT: Correct. Thinking about costs in this way will help you make more rational decisions in your everyday life. Now tell me, how can you explain your decision to go to college?

ERIC: I chose to go to college because, for me, the value of a year in college <u>gives me a higher stand and offers me a better long-term opportunity that someone without a college degree.</u>

Explanation:

The question poses a discussion about the opportunity cost of attending college. The understanding behind this is that by choosing to go to college, Eric is forfeiting the opportunity to get a job as a cashier that would earn him $16,000 a year while incurring his college fees of $32,000. Therefore, the total cost of attending college to him should be $48,000.

3 0
2 years ago
Jenna's closing agent has asked her to get a spot survey of the property she's purchasing. what will this accomplish for jenna a
just olya [345]

It notes the location, size, and shape of any improvements on a property.

<h3>What is property?</h3>

Any item over which a person or a business has legal title is considered property. Property can refer to either real objects, such as houses, automobiles, or appliances, or intangible items with the promise of future value, such as stock and bond certificates.

There are three types of property in economics and political economy: private property, public property, and collective property (also called cooperative property).

Property is divided into two types: corporeal property and incorporeal property. Corporeal Property is seen and touched, whereas incorporeal Property is not. Furthermore, corporeal Property is the right to tangible possession, whereas incorporeal Property is an incorporeal right in rem.

To know more about property follow the link:

brainly.com/question/778086

#SPJ4

6 0
2 years ago
The gross requirements of a given component part are determined from ______________________.
il63 [147K]

Answer: The correct answer is "c) planned orders of the parent".

Explanation: The gross requirements of a given component part are determined from <u>planned orders of the parent</u>

Without the release of planned orders from immediate parents, the gross requirements of a given component part could not be determined.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Ernesto owns a house painting company. Total sales for the past year were $75,000. His bills for running the business were $30,0
    5·1 answer
  • What is angelica's overall debt to credit ratio?
    9·1 answer
  • The first step in establishing training and development programs is to:
    15·1 answer
  • At Creighton Company, the following errors were discovered after the transactions had been journalized and posted.1. A collectio
    7·1 answer
  • Additional information:1. Accounts receivable decreased $360,000 during the year.2. Prepaid expenses increased $170,000 during t
    12·1 answer
  • _____ is a practice where a store sends coupons to a customer, who has already bought a product from the store, for a more expen
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements is CORRECT regarding deciding whether an alcohol sale is legal?
    9·2 answers
  • Values for the first year of a project are projected as: Sales = $1.800, Depreciation = $300, Fixed costs = $450, Variable costs
    10·1 answer
  • A project that costs $25,000 today will generate cash flows of $8,600 per year for seven years. What is the project's payback pe
    15·1 answer
  • Net capital outflow Select one: a. is always less than net exports. b. could be any of the above. c. is always greater than net
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!