Answer and Explanation:
The journal entries are as follows;
a. On Jan 1
No journal entry is required
b. On Feb 5
Contra asset Dr $1,320
To Sales revenue $1,320
(being sales revenue is recorded)
Cost of goods sold Dr $670
To Inventory $670
(being cost of goods sold is recorded)
c. On Feb 25
Cash $3,300
Contra asset Dr $1,320
To Sales revenue $1,980
(being sales revenue is recorded)
Cost of goods sold Dr $300
To Inventory $300
(being cost of goods sold is recorded)
If the tax system in the US is progressive, then those with lower income will pay proportionally less than those with higher income as the latter will have a higher tax rate but in fact the rich people usually have or find a lot of tax loopholes to reduce their taxes so may still not be paying a fair share of their taxes compared to the poor people who don't have these loopholes.
Answer
The answer and procedures of the exercise are attached in the following archives.
Step-by-step explanation:
You will find the procedures, formulas or necessary explanations in the archive attached below. If you have any question ask and I will aclare your doubts kindly.
Answer:
The equilibrium expected rate of return is higher for Kaskin than for Quinn.
Explanation:
Option A “The equilibrium expected rate of return is higher for Kaskin than for Quinn” is more accurate because the expected return is calculated by multiplying the risk premium with beta value and then adding with risk-free return. However, if the beta value is high, then the magnitude after multiplying with the risk premium will be high. Moreover, is magnitude will be added to risk-free return to find the expected return. Thus, it can be seen that Kaskin has high beta 1.2 as compared to Quinn’s beta value 0.6. So, the Kaskin has a higher expected return.
Answer:
15
Explanation:
15151515151515152515255151251512512
