<span>The parts that explicitly support that ideal are where he says that he calls "not upon a few, but upon all" and where he says that "the city and the country, alarmed at one common danger, came forth to meet and to repulse it." To me, that is saying that he is calling upon everyone to potentially sacrifice their life to obtain a goal that they believe is worth that cost.</span>
Explanation:
?????<u>?</u><u>?</u><u>?</u><u>?</u><u>?</u><u>?</u><u>?</u><u>?</u><u>?</u><u>?</u><u>?</u><u>?</u><u>?</u><u>?</u><u>?</u><u>?</u><u>?</u><u>?</u><u>?</u><u>?</u><u>?</u><u>?</u><u>?</u><u>?</u><u>?</u><u>?</u><u>?</u><u>?</u>
A is wrong because it’s a statement.
B is the answer because it asks “why haven’t you” & that’s the example.
C is another statement
D is a demand, not a bandwagon fallacy
