Answer:
employment at will
Explanation:
According to my research on different employee responsibilities, I can say that based on the information provided within the question the company can state that the layoffs were instances of employment at will. This is because the employees were only showing up when it suited them, which is not part of their contract, the employees need to show up to work on time based on their work schedule.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer:
C. Fixed price with incentive
Explanation:
In the fixed price with incentive contract, if the supplier can demonstrate actual cost savings through production efficiencies or substitution of materials, the resulting savings from the initial price targets are shared between the supplier and the purchaser at a predetermined rate.
Fixed-price incentive contract refers to a fixed-price contract which provides for adjusting profit and establishing the final contract price by application of a formula based on the relationship of total final negotiated cost to total target cost. It provides for the adjustment of the contract price and profit.
The amount of the adjustment is determined by a formula which is based on the relationship between total negotiated cost and the target cost or the actual cost, or some other factors.
Answer:
These are the options for the question:
A. Management styles
B. Communication practices
C. Workplace atmosphere
D. Stock valuation
E. Corporate values
And this is the correct answer:
D. Stock valuation
Explanation:
Stock valuation is not likely to be a cause of conflict after the merge because stocks are valued in similar ways accross companies. This factor is precisely what makes stock value a good gauge of a firm's value: because it is measured in the same way for all firms, investors know what a specific stock value means, and can take rational decisions according to it.
All the other statements do refer to organizational culture elements that have a great degree of subjectivity depending on the company, and that can cause conflict after the merge.
it would be (I think) identity theft. hope this helps!
