Reorganization
<u>Explanation:</u>
Revamping may allude to the restoration of an organization's funds as per a liquidation. It can likewise allude to any procedure that influences the duty structure of an organization. Furthermore, revamping may allude to a merger or obtaining or offer of an organization that changes the proprietorship, stock, or lawful and the executive's structure.
The redesign is a conventional court-managed procedure of rebuilding an organization's funds after chapter 11. As per insolvency laws, explicitly Chapter 11, an organization is given security from lenders during the timespan when the organization proposes and a liquidation court audits and affirms a particular revamping plan. The rearrangement is planned to reimburse lenders to the most extreme degree conceivable and to rebuild the organization's accounts, the executives, and tasks to keep a similar issue from emerging once more.
Could the answer be advertisements
Answer:
because they are fun and if you get distracted you don't want to finish what you are doing
Explanation:
1. If butter complements margarine for instance, and there occurs a sudden increase in the price of butter leading to lower demand, this would affect the demand for margarine negatively leading to a fall in the demand for margarine.
2. If this goods are substitutes the demand for butter will increase when the price of margarine rises.
This is because it is only natural for people to switch to the next best alternative (substitute) that fills the same purpose or needs.
3. Remember Ice cream and ice cream cones complementary goods; meaning the demand for one increases the demand for the other and vice versa.
4. If the price of ice cream increases, demand would also decrease for ice cream as consumers are usually sensitive to price.
This decrease in the demand for ice cream would also affect ice cream cones since they complement each other, leading to a decrease in the demand for ice cream cones.
Answer:
The federal government can regulate Jen's activity citing the supreme court rule of the government ability to regulate any activity interstate or intrastate that affects interstate commerce.
In the line of this argument it means that a farmer growing and of goods affects interstate commerce.
The farmers best argument concerning the federal government regulating their activities due to interstate commerce is that his activities are purely local and although I don't believe any court will hear him out.
Explanation:
