This question is incomplete, here´s the complete question
Based on your reading of the Challenger case, do you think the advocacy or inquiry approach dominated the decision-making process?
Answer: advocacy approach
Explanation:
The fact that the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) had dismissed probabilistic risk analyses has been pointed out as the main cause of the Challenger catastrophe. In this case, advocacy dominated the inquiry approach, as management didn´t allow further inquires in probabilistic risk analysis, prioritizing the design-oriented approach that predominated in NASA during the 1970s.
The answer is functionalism because this is responsible of
having to promote stability and solidarity in a way of learning such as having
to understanding something in the purpose of having to know what behavior is
and how it will affect an individual.
Answer: Nagging should not be done
Explanation: Nagging is the activity in which a person starts to find the fault in another person in persistently.This type of behavior in continuous way can lead to irritate or annoy the other person.
The case mentioned in the question also describes about the nagging behavior showed by Bobbi towards her friend Charla. Bobbi is continuously finding mistake in behavior of Charla that she does not take enough stand for herself in the office. Thus, Charla is getting irritated with this act.
Answer:
- <u>The rebel group, Houthis, took control of much of Yemen.</u>
- <u>ISIS took control of parts of Yemen.</u>
Explanation:
Indeed Yemen has become a failed State because of this two main factors:
First, the Houthis a minority group had formed a rebel group that caused war in the country; they attempted to take control of the entire country, forcing the country's President Mr Hadi to flee abroad in March 2015.
Secondly, ISIS a noteworthy terrorist organization took advantage of the chaos in Yemen by controlling parts of the country in the south and carrying out deadly attacks. All this factors contributed to Yemen becoming a failed state.
Answer:
Personal fable
Explanation:
A personal fable is a phenomenon that occurs with teens. In this phenomenon, the teen thinks that they are unique and invulnerable. They are special in the world. The personal fable is a normal cognitive error at this stage. But unfortunately, it is sometimes dangerous for teens because of the personal fable in teens.
Thus here Roberto was arguing with his father on driving because of the personal fable attitude in the teenager.
