Answer:
Uses precise language to describe what Tan saw.
Explanation:
The short narrative essay "Fish Cheeks" by Amy Tan recounts the Christmas Eve dinner that her family had arranged with the minister's family in their home. Being a Chinese in America, Amy recounts how she was left anxious about inviting the boy who's her crush and his family over for dinner and worries that he might think them inferior.
The given line from the short essay is Amy describing what she saw when her mother was preparing for the dinner. Her mother's act of removing <em>"black veins out of the backs of fleshy prawns"</em> presents <u>the use of precise language that describes what she saw her mother do</u>.
Thus, the correct answer is the first option.
Answer:
I'd say complications. It wouldn't be cause because the said conflict is already a problem. A reaction has nothing to do with the problem getting worse itself. Resolutions are when the problem is resolved. I think it would be complications, because it's making the conflict worse than it already was.
Explanation:
The correct answer is option D: A Haggle
If a buyer is haggling a seller for a better price and the seller holds its ground it means that the act of haggling demonstrates they both have competing interests since one of them is interested in buying for a lower price while the other is interested in selling for a higher price.
The correct answer is D - all of the above.
A literary interpretation is a literary work being explained deeper than the typical understanding. In order for a strong literary interpretation, it must include all of the factors listed above.
Well, you're going to talk about the conflicts in The Lottery and The Lady or the Tiger... So... in The Lottery, the main conflict was that the lady (whatever her name was) was chosen to be stoned in the lottery. It wasn't really resolved in anyway, except that she got.. stoned. I haven't read The Lady or the Tiger, but you would do the same thing for that. Then you would state the theme, or moral, or main point, of each story. And then you would compare how the resolutions for both conflicts demonstrate the stories' themes.. Does it make a bit more sense?
