Answer:
That it
Explanation:
There have been mass extinctions during the Cenozoic as there were during the Mesozoic and Paleozoic, but not as many animals and plants have disappeared. Finally, humanity appeared during the last two million years.The human lineage only diverged from our most recent common ancestor about 5 million years ago; less than half of 1% of that time, and modern Homo sapiens is only between 200,000 and 50,000 years old, depending on your definition.
The answer is c the ability for the os to detect
True
…………………………………………………..
The answer is;
Current
Voltage
Power/Wattage
Circuit
Water moving through pipes is like electricity flowing in a circuit. The flow of electricity is an actual flow of electrons. That movement of electrons is what is known as current. Think of current as the volume of water flowing through a water pipe. The electrons need some force or pressure to move, and so is water in a pipe. The voltage is that electromotive force; the pressure that pushes the electrons in a system. The power measured in Watts is the rate at which the energy is consumed. For the current to flow the circuit must be complete. Otherwise we cannot say that we have power if the circuit is not closed.
Answer:Technology law scholars have recently started to consider the theories of affordance and technological mediation, imported from the fields of psychology, human-computer interaction (HCI), and science and technology studies (STS). These theories have been used both as a means of explaining how the law has developed, and more recently in attempts to cast the law per se as an affordance. This exploratory paper summarises the two theories, before considering these applications from a critical perspective, noting certain deficiencies with respect to potential normative application and definitional clarity, respectively. It then posits that in applying them in the legal context we should seek to retain the relational user-artefact structure around which they were originally conceived, with the law cast as the user of the artefact, from which it seeks certain features or outcomes. This approach is effective for three reasons. Firstly, it acknowledges the power imbalance between law and architecture, where the former is manifestly subject to the decisions, made by designers, which mediate and transform the substance of the legal norms they instantiate in technological artefacts. Secondly, from an analytical perspective, it can help avoid some of the conceptual and definitional problems evident in the nascent legal literature on affordance. Lastly, approaching designers on their own terms can foster better critical evaluation of their activities during the design process, potentially leading to more effective ‘compliance by design’ where the course of the law’s mediation by technological artefacts can be better anticipated and guided by legislators, regulators, and legal practitioners.
Keywords
Affordance, technological mediation, postphenomenology, legal theory, compliance by design, legal design
