Answer:
It is either the 2 or the 3
Explanation:
The third is maybe not as likley because the passage says different gargoyles from different times and from the number 3 anwser seems like it is only 1 type of gargoyles.
It would be nice but unfortunately its impossible to do. Switzerland is one of the few countries in the world who has been able to pull off avoiding war but even they were close to being invaded by Hitler in WW2 even though they claimed to be neutral. If you make war inhumane & out law it you would also prohibit yourself to defend itself. There will always be war there will always be greed there will always be reasons one country finds to attack another & more often then not a smaller one at that but still there will always be war. banning war would be like saying you should have doors on your house because their made of wood that would ultimately invite crime to your house in some form or another while at the same time living you little option in stopping it when it came. You don't have to start a war to be pulled into it & any involvement would lead to or contribute to inhumane things. If german invaded Switzerland & they fought back it would take Germany longer to take over delaying the victory most predicted & extending the time civilians could be hurt or killed fighting. While if they roll over & gave up they'd end up like France who still suffered even after giving up. So either way they would have suffered & had inhumane things done.
When getting a secondary source one thing to remember is it can be created by an educated expert and published in an academic journal. Also, a firsthand account published in a magazine will also work as a secondary source. So bother A and B will be correct. If only one can be chosen, A would be the better of the two. <span />
A collection of items of the same type stored in a hidden or inaccessible place. It would be appropriate to use for something like “I have my own cache.” Like a collection stored in one place.
