Frederick Douglass wrote autobiography “Narrative of the Life of Fredrick Douglass, an American slave”. The critics doubted that he was a slave because he was able to read and write and he was also smart and intelligent
Explanation:
Fredrick was a slave who escaped and became a well renowned author activist and a speaker. He had written a dozen of books delivered a lot of noteworthy speeches though he had received a very little formal education. He was also the lawyer for the women’s right and he fought for the right of women to vote.
He was a prominent leader of the abolitionist party and he dedicated most of his life for the upliftment of people from slavery. He was talented and intelligent so the critics refuse to accept that he was from the slave society
Answer:
'birisi bunu yapabilirmi' türkçesi arkadaşım
Answer:
I believe its the last sentence "Learn from me,if not by my precepts, at least by my example, how dangerous is the acquirement of knowledge and how much happier that man is who believes his native town to be the world, than he who aspires to become greater than his nature will allow
Explanation:
This is bc its talking about how its dangerous to gain high knowledge and how someone who aspires to become greater then his nature will allow shows that it leads to negative consequences bc it compairs that to a happier man who believes his active toen to be the world
The main ideas shaping US imperialism were "Manifest destiny" and the "White man's burden". Manifest destiny refers to the 19th century belief that the United States were meant to expand across North America because of the particular excellence of its (white) people and (democratic) institutions. This lead to the Trail of Tears, among other atrocities. Once the US reached the Pacific Ocean, new lands came into view (Puerto Rico, the Phillipines). Manifest destiny became entwined with the idea that "civilized" nations had a moral obligation to colonize other peoples, which Rudyard Kipling summed up in his poem "White Man's Burden". The tensions in this "benevolent imperialism" were never fully resolved; the US invasion of Irak was launched under similar pretenses (the invasion was "for the good" of those invaded). The idea that other peoples have a right to self determination regardless of their level of development has not yet become accepted by the great powers, including the US.
Answer:
I don't understand the question?
