1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
stellarik [79]
3 years ago
12

Nelson decides to invest $1,000,000 in a period annuity that

Mathematics
1 answer:
Natali5045456 [20]3 years ago
4 0

Answer: c

Step-by-step explanation:

You might be interested in
I don't know how to do these<br>need help​
elena-s [515]

Answer:

spinner 2 is 14

Step-by-step explanation:

7+3=10

10+4=13

8 0
3 years ago
Count to find the area. Tell if the area is exact or an estimate.<br> The exact is
muminat

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

There isn’t any numbers or pics to go by

7 0
4 years ago
I found this proof by induction that all people in canada are the same height, i was wondering what is the incorrect step?
frosja888 [35]

The incorrect step in the induction that all people in Canada are the same height is; Step 9

<h3>How to prove Mathematical Induction?</h3>

The principle of mathematical induction as follows:

For example, we have a set of natural numbers. Now, suppose that 1 is in the set. Now, we assume that anytime n is in the set, n + 1 is also in the set. Therefore we can say that every natural number is in the set.

The wrong step in the given mathematical Induction is Step 9. This is because;

We might not be to see anyone else in the arbitrary group G other than groups P or Q!

Recall that G is a group of k + 1 people. Thus, provided that k > 1, k + 1 > 2 and that a third person R in G does not exist, then the rest of the proof will work.

The steps above proves that;

S(k) = S(k + 1), for every k > 1.

Thus, we can also say that if S(2) is true, then it equally means S(3) is true and so on till infinity.

From our induction process written so far, we have see that S(1) was true. However, our induction step in the question does not show us that that S(1) = S(2) = true.

So: Thus, from the induction I have done It shows that S(1) not imply S(2) and as a result the proof is fallacious.

Read more about Mathematical Induction at; brainly.com/question/24672369

#SPJ1

8 0
2 years ago
#41.
yaroslaw [1]
No since the between consecutive numbers doesn't give a constant
7 0
3 years ago
Plzz help i dont understand
tangare [24]
There's no picture up
7 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • How to do ending time 10:08 A.m. elapsed time 30 minutes page 583 584 and third grade math
    6·1 answer
  • 4y2 - 2x + 7 + 2y for x = 7 and y =2.
    13·1 answer
  • You are trying to electroplate a new superconducting ceramic-metal onto a circuit board. The rate at which a plating will be uns
    12·1 answer
  • For every 21 litres of petrol a car can run for 80 km. How much petrol do you need (to 1 DP) to ensure the car has enough petrol
    14·1 answer
  • What are two consecutive even integers that has a sum of -42?
    15·1 answer
  • A simple off bacteria is debating according to the half life model. If the simple begins with 800 bacteria, and after 18 minutes
    8·1 answer
  • What is 2/3 - 5/12? Show me the answer.
    15·1 answer
  • If x equals 1/8 Y what is -1 / X?​
    11·1 answer
  • What is an equation of the line that passes through the point (1,-3) and is perpendicular to the line x+3y=21?
    12·1 answer
  • What is the value of 2/5 + 5/7
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!