Answer:
B. S and I drop by $0.60 trillion.
Explanation:
We know that
Y = C + I + G
$12 trillion = $8 trillion + I + $2 trillion
$12 trillion = $10 trillion + I
So, I = $12 trillion - $10 trillion
= $2 trillion
As the government purchases increase from $2 trillion to $2.60 trillion
and the rest of the things remain the same.
So New I = $12 trillion - $8 trillion - $2.60 trillion
= $1.4 trillion
So, the difference would be equals to
= $2 trillion - $1.4 trillion
= $0.6 trillion
The $0.6 trillion reflect fall in the investment
And the saving and the investment are equal to each other
Hence, the B option is the right answer
Answer: Do nothing and continue to monitoring implementation
Explanation:
According to the given question, in an organization the marketing department notes that the implementation of the positioning strategy in the company increases the average amount of spending as per the transaction that is reduce.
The main objective of monitoring implementation is that it effectively monitor the ongoing process and also analyzing the given data on the basis of the given situation.
In this type of situation the company continues start monitoring implementation as it helps in evaluating the given data or information systematically and measuring the efficiency of the management.
Therefore, The given answer is correct.
Answer:
1. Increases in demand will increase both the interest rate and the total amount of borrowing and lending. Decreases in demand will decrease both the interest rate and the total amount of borrowing and lending.
Explanation:
The assessment ratio, which is used to convert the value of property to the assessed value, can also be considered <u>Equalization Rate</u>.
<h3>What is the equalization rate?</h3>
The equalization rate is the ratio of the total assessed value (AV) to a municipality's total market value (MV).
The equalization rate is a measurement of a municipality's level of assessment (LOA) by the state.
This implies that the municipality determines the AV while the state determines the MV.
Thus, the assessment ratio, which is used to convert the value of property to the assessed value, can also be considered <u>Equalization Rate</u>.
Learn more about the equalization rate at brainly.com/question/5428406
#SPJ1
Answer:
Explanation:
1. Ticket location is the most important attributes in the overall purchase decision. It is with a 39.49% of the general choice weight.
2. Verily, the conjoint assessment results are important in choosing assessing decisions. Ticket cost contained 38% of the examination. From the data, we can conclude fans are increasingly loath to purchase $60 tickets. By joining this ticket cost with various characteristics with higher utility scores, we can deliver a group that will be impressively all the more addressing the fans. The proportionate should be conceivable with the other evaluating decisions to make various group offers .The Portland Trail Blazers' NBA foundation was in a terrible position. Fans were spilling out the door, and the players couldn't find the bushel. The gathering wore a 22-36 record and advance managers presently ran its home, the Rose Garden after its owners had proclaimed money related indebtedness. The gathering's guide had been ended for sure. The field had been a sellout just three years earlier, and the gathering had been dear by Portland. However, starting in the 2003 season, interest began to fall pointedly by more than 15 percent by 2005. In the midst of a comparative time, 42 of 70 indulgence suites sat void in the midst of the period. More Portland crowd individuals viewed the atmosphere by then Blazers' amusements.
3. Yes there could be more than one.
By looking at the conjoint assessment and other data open from the survey, I believe that the Portland Trail Blazers the officials should offer two unmistakable packs. One being either six or ten redirections for each group. Disregarding the way that organization lean towards the six preoccupation pack, giving fans the decisions to buy for ten diversions will empower the gathering to sell more tickets. Regarding seating, they should offer the mid 300 court seats, averaging between $40-50