Answer:
A) there was no way to foresee that the incident would happen.
Explanation:
Wayne hadn't done anything wrong before in the company, his behavior at the workplace could be described as very good; no complaint in 20 years and no criminal record what so ever. If Wayne was frustrated about his job, he disguised it very well. No one can predict this type of behavior if the person shows no prior signs of violence or frustration.
Answer:
B. Memory
Explanation:
Mnemonics are a tool to aid memory.
Is this an open ended question ? Or multiple choice ?
Answer:
The definition becomes defined in the clarification paragraph below, according to the particular circumstance.
Explanation:
- As either the engineering boss, I believe Sally knows her technical employees better upon where people choose and hate about either the meetings that have been taking place. She understands that her workers like freedom but also that requesting them should report periodically or daily will potentially hinder their efficiency, and also some waste work and attention.
- Therefore, Sally can find some middle ground path somewhere, practically. She might make an option in which those her boss, Mark Hayes, the director of engineering, including her staff should be satisfied with the conclusion reached. Sally would invite Mark please hold a regular meeting to provide a more excellent method rather than just group communication. Any efficiency improvements barely alter a day, cost too much, and often waste precious time. She should indeed, lift all the questions concerning her workers as well as the negatives involved with either the regular interactions.
- She could also ensure fine to measure throughout her workers to hold regular sessions because it will encourage the business to always have a daily transcript of the conversation the week before and whether performance might be enhanced within this meeting can already be covered.
Answer:
Promissory estoppel
Explanation:
Promissory estoppel means that in legal tenet that a promise or pledge can be enforced by law, actually if formulated without legal consideration, if the George now the (promisor) has made a pledge to a Susy the (promises) who then depends on that promise for a subsequent detriment. So what Promissory estoppel is expected to do is to stop the (George) promisor from insisting that an underlying promise should not be legally authorized or implemented. So Susy can sue George on the basis of promissory estoppel and get a reward for George's disappointment