The sentence that demonstrate correct punctuation of a compound sentence is Susan learned Russian with ease but, I could never get past the basics of Russian grammar. That is option A.
<h3>What is Compound sentence?</h3>
A Compound sentence is defined as the sentence that is made up of two clauses which are independent clauses that are joined together by a conjunction such as for, and, nor, but, or, yet, so.
From the sentence given, the correct sentence with the right punctuation is "Susan learned Russian with ease but, I could never get past the basics of Russian grammar".
This is because the first independent clauses must end with a comma before the conjunction.
Learn more about clause here:
brainly.com/question/541212
#SPJ1
Answer: long-term governments should not be changed lightly, letter "C".
Explanation: people tend to fear the unknown, and changing means stepping into the unknown. When it comes to government it is even important maintaining a certain <em>status quo</em>, because every nation must have a long-term plan.
A very good example of this is Dom Dinis, king of Portugal in 1279. He ordered his people to plant many trees, foreseeing that Portugal was going to rule the seas. He wasn't alive when the great navigations of his kingdom happened, but the trees he ordered to plant were put to very good use when the ships were built. <u>That is what a long-term plan is, and that can not happen if governments and rules are changed constantly.</u>
However, the text says to not tolerate absolute despotism, so there will be times when we need to act, and these times are when a government does not plan. When there are no plans, our future is at stake.
Therefore, it is important not to change governments for any meanness, meaningless or pesky reason; this is a very important decision and it must happen when absolutely necessary.
I believe that writers are definitely justified in challenging the artistic status quo, because that's what true artists do. But to answer the question of why they do it, there are more answers. Think of Emily Dickinson, for example. She always strongly stood by her own freedoms and decisions to go against the current, and she's one of the most famous of American writers because of it. Aside from the fact she wanted to, going against the norm for writers often gives them more attention than if they wrote what was "expected" at the time. When studying famous American writers, we are often told to study things that they did differently than most, some, mostly the less notable today, only had minor differences, like they made their stories from different tenses, etc. But the most notorious used themes that may have been taboo and writing styles even more diverse. There is always the counter culture and most writers that we study belonged to it, sick of the large amount of similar, traditional stories that lacked element, or simply wanted to stand out.
Another reason could be that writers wanted to spread the written word to all different kinds of things that have yet to be written about, different characters that haven't yet been discovered. And there are the related reasons like how writers didn't even know they were writing for the public, only time tells, like with Ann Frank. She wasn't afraid to put opinions down on paper because it was her own personal journal but it had become a famous piece of literature because of the opinions.
I think writers break from tradition because the traditions are often not realistic and these artists are the only ones who will tell the truth, and that is why they do it, and that is why they are so important.
Answer:
You should use Pathos to evoke emotion in your audience.
Explanation:
There are three well-known forms of persuasion first introduced by Aristotle: Ethos, Logos, and Pathos.
Ethos happens when the speaker appeals to ethics. For that reason, how effective this device will be depends on how credible the speaker is. If the speaker is a role model or, for instance, an expert on the matter, listeners are more likely to trust his argument.
Logos appeals to logic and its efficacy relies on structure and evidence. Thus, the speaker must walk the audience through the logical path to the conclusion they must reach.
Finally, Pathos is an emotional argument, an appeal to the audience's emotions. It targets shared feelings and cultural values with the goal of having the listener relate to what is being said. Empathy, pity, comprehension, even anger can all be triggered by an effective argument relying on Pathos.
Answer:
The crane is associated with her as an indicator of the weather.
Explanation:
Hope this helps
Correct me if this is wrong
