Answer:
If the scale factor is increased in 2.5, the increased width will be:
Step-by-step explanation:
Remember that an oblong is longer than it is wide, by this reason, the ratio of 4:3 could mean, if we give a number, by each 4 cm in the length, there is 3 cm in the width, in this form, if the oblong has a length of 12 cm, the width is:
So:
Then, the original width is 9 cm, as the scale factor must be increased 2.5, we can multiply the found width to obtain the increased width:
- Increased width = 9 cm * 2.5
- <u>Increased width = 22.5 cm</u>
As you can see, <u><em>the increased widt will be 22.5 cm</em></u>.
Answer:
D
Step-by-step explanation:
Given a correlation coefficient of -.11 the correlation would be extremely weak therefore it would have almost no correlation or causation
Why? Well when the value of the correlation is between -.1 and .1 then the relationship is said to have no correlation
-.11 is very close to -.1 thus meaning it would have pretty much no correlation
Answer:
no, it is not a solution to the given inequality
Step-by-step explanation:
The answer is C . cube 2
Explanation:
Using PEMDAS its Parentheses, exponents ,multiple then divide and add , subtract
Answer:
im not writing all that lol
Step-by-step explanation:
So 1 would be 100%, 10/10 and 0 would be, 0/10 and 0% so for 50% for example would be 5/10, 0.5 and so on..
then just think of things that have a 100% chance and all the other percentages... example The sun rising tomorrow. and no chance 0% example the school flying away
