Hey there according to my research I found this same similar question on here with options:
<span>A) The herbivorous animals would thrive and continue to live on the grassland for many generations.
B) The herbivorous animals would also migrate to the national park, because ecosystems tend to maintain balance.
C) The herbivorous animal populations would decline as they are now easy targets for hunters and other predators.
D) The herbivorous animals would initially thrive, but eventual overgrazing would lead to starvation or migration.Among those four, the answer is D).
-Love, live, and watch anime.</span>
Answer:
Option A, Fixed quota models are risky because slight miscalculations can result in fish population extinction
Explanation:
Some of the major drawbacks of modelling fishing are as follows –
a) The fixed quota model is very risky as a miniscule change in attributes can result into extinction of fish.
b) On the other hand fixed effort harvesting can decrease the risk of fish population extinction
Hence, option A is correct
Since they can go back to they're original form after a reaction that's why it's reusable
Cortical areas that are not primarily concerned with sensory motor or language functions are cortical associated areas.
The cortex association areas are the areas, which perform the function of detection of stimulus, which cannot be easily detected by the help of the primary cortex.
They are not directly concerned with the sensory and motor information. They are mainly responsible for the interpretation, integration, and generation of action on the information from other areas of cortex.