Answer:
It is based on dogmatism.
Explanation:
While Skepticism is a term in philosophy, which is considered as a behavior, or a form of doubt in relation to the truth of a particular thing or situation. It stated that absolute certain knowledge is impossible.
On the other hand, Unmitigated skepticism which is a form of skepticism, claims that categorically and dogmatically it knows that no one knows anything. This appears contradictory and apparently self-defeating.
Hence, among some of the reasons why unmitigated skepticism is difficult for a person to consistently hold as a serious philosophical position is because it dogmatically accept a position or knowledge that no one knows anything, which is self-defeating and contradictory.
Sometimes, when people suffer wrong in the hands of others, they hold on to it, till they eventually explode. This form of conflict where Bernie remembers insults and times he's been ignored by his family, then after a few days, he explodes telling about all these verbal and nonverbal injuries, is called:
Gunnysacking is a form of conflict where a person does not immediately address issues when offended. He rather holds them in till a point where they can no longer control themselves.
They explode and take people by surprise because others had believed that all was well with them.
Learn more here:
brainly.com/question/14093875
