Answer:
A - McCulloch v. Maryland
Explanation:
Hope this helped :)
The answer is "<span>It was a subtle way to make participants feel more or less confident."
</span>
When the arguments were solid, individuals who gestured or nodded their heads concurred with them more than individuals who shook their heads, on the grounds that the head nodders had more trust in the solid contentions that they heard, But when contentions were frail, head gesturing had the contrary impact, it gave individuals more certainty that the contentions they heard were powerless, making them less persuading.Thus we conclude from this that anything you can do to influence individuals to have more trust in your message will make it more compelling, as long as your contentions are solid.
Answer:
"High school athletes stop shopping there" is the correct choice.
Explanation:
- Athletes throughout junior high appear to have to get the brand of shoes that support with their freedom of movement as well as usually have high maximal aerobic levels. Dress shoes don't have these apps.
- Because once high school players quit purchasing their shoes throughout the supermarket, the amount of shares mostly in inventory levels tends to stagnate as it was unable to contact people.
The other options in question aren't relevant to the particular circumstance. And the response to the above seems to be the right one.
In a centrally planned economy the central government makes all decisions about the production and consumption of goods and services. In a market economy economic decisions are made by individuals and are based on exchange, or trade.
Answer:
Hi! The answer to your question would be option B.
Explanation:
The answer to your question woul be option B. Use full justification.
Full justification allows the text to be easy to read while making it look organized at the same time.
