1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kenny6666 [7]
3 years ago
12

At the beginning of the current year, both Gerald and Nicolas own 50% of Apple Corporation. In July, Gerald sold his stock to Sa

rah for $110,000. At the beginning of the year, Apple Corporation had accumulated E & P of $200,000 and its current E & P is $250,000 (prior to any distributions). Apple distributed $260,000 on March 1 ($130,000 to Gerald and $130,000 to Nicolas) and distributed another $260,000 on October 1 ($130,000 to Sarah and $130,000 to Nicolas). What are the tax implications of the $130,000 distribution to Sarah?
Business
2 answers:
Nitella [24]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Distributions are taxable income and are included in the gross income computation as they are total amount in cash ($130,000) or otherwise, received by the owners or accrued to the owners or in favor of the owners and must be not of a capital nature.

Therefore the $130,000 is taxable income is as a profit share.

Explanation:

pishuonlain [190]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Explanation:

As present E and P is assigned on a star rata premise to circulations made during the year, one-half, or $125,000 ($250,000 ' $260,000/$520,000), is designated to the March 1 dispersion and one-half ($125,000) is dispensed to the October 1 conveyance.

The $200,000 of aggregated E and P is distributed sequentially. Subsequently, on March 1, Apple has $325,000 of profit paying limit ($125,000 of current E and P and $200,000 of aggregated E and P). Consequently, the March 1 dispersion is altogether treated as a profit and Apple has $65,000 of amassed E and P staying after the circulation.

On October 1, Apple has $190,000 of profit paying limit ($125,000 of current E and P and $65,000 of collected E and P). So of the $260,000 dissemination, $190,000 is treated as a profit and, as a half investor, a lot of this is $95,000.

In this way, of the $130,000 got by Sarah, $95,000 is a profit disseminated from E and P ($62,500 current E and P + $32,500 amassed E and P), while the remaining $35,000 is a nontaxable recuperation of capital. Thus, her stock premise is diminished to $75,000 ($110,000 – $35,000).

You might be interested in
Based on the case and previous calculations, please answer the following short answer questions. Note: Your instructor will need
mezya [45]

Question Completion:

see Exhibit 4 attached.

Answer:

1. The largest and smallest divisions by net sales in 2017:

Largest divisions:

Fabric & Home care with 32%

Baby, Feminine & Family Care, 28%

Smallest divisions:

Beauty with 18%

Grooming, 11%

Healthcare, 11%

2. The one most important division in terms of the proportionate net earnings for the company is:

Fabric & Home Care

Explanation:

The two largest divisions generate 60% of the net sales of the company while the three smallest divisions generate only 40%.  In terms of the proportionate net earnings for the company, the two largest divisions also generate 53% of the net earnings of the company, while the three smallest divisions generate 47%.  The analysis shows that the company's financial sustenance is largely driven by the Fabric & Home Care division and the Baby, Feminine & Family Care division.  Another up-and-coming division is the Beauty division, which generates 18% of the net sales and 20% of the net earnings.

Download docx
4 0
3 years ago
A.R.C. is a large non-profit humanitarian aid organization that has been forced to pull out of several African markets in recent
irga5000 [103]

Answer:d

Explanation: Economic instability can include a volatile inflation rate and volatile rate of economic growth. It can involve higher unemployment and uncertainty about the economic cycle.

big fall in stock markets can trigger falls in consumer confidence and lead to a recession. The Wall Street crash of 1929 was a primary cause of the great depression. However, the stock market crash of 1987 did not cause an economic downturn. In fact, in the UK it was followed by an unprecedented economic boom. This was partly due to the way the government responded by cutting income tax and cutting interest rates. Interest rates are used as a tool in controlling inflation. However, they can also have an impact on consumer spending. Sometimes interest rates may have little impact; however, if they coincide with other factors they can cause a much bigger than expected fall in consumer spending. For example, in the UK, many homeowners have a variable mortgage. Therefore a small change in interest rates can have a big effect on disposable income. If an increase in interest rates was combined with another factor such as the slowing down of house price growth it may cause a big fall in spending. Number One priority to Target Economic growth and reduce unemployment. At the very least, economic growth needs to be close to long run trend rate 2.5%; it actually needs to be higher to catch up with lost spare capacity. Strong growth will help boost tax revenues and reduce unemployment. It is only in this climate you can successfully reduce the deficit. There is supply-side unemployment, especially in Europe, which has seen prolonged structural unemployment in past two decades. But, the fundamental cause is lack of aggregate demand

8 0
4 years ago
Par value a.is the monetary value assigned per share in the corporate charter b.is established for a share of stock after it is
nika2105 [10]

Answer:

c.represents what a share of stock is worth

Explanation:

Hope it helped...Please mark brainliest. Have a nice day!

4 0
3 years ago
Sellers of a good bear the larger share of the tax burden when a tax is placed on a product for which the:
fenix001 [56]

Answer:

The correct answer is option ii.

Explanation:

In the case of imposition of tax on a good, the suppliers will bear the greater share of burden if the demand is more elastic than the supply.  

The imposition of tax leads to an increase in the price of the product. If the demand is more elastic, the quantity demanded will decrease to a greater extent with the increase in price.  

The supply being less elastic will change to a smaller extent, thus a greater tax burden will be borne by the suppliers.

5 0
3 years ago
3. Ali invested two stocks, A and B. he invested
Stels [109]

Answer:

10%

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • So im 12 yrs old and i have been asked to babysit my neighbors two boys for 4 hours 5 days a week ( one 4 one 2 yrs old) since i
    15·1 answer
  • Mary’s hourly wage is twice that of John’s. John’s and Dennis’ hourly wages together total $60. If Dennis earns 1/3 of John’s ra
    14·1 answer
  • Peggy Lane Corp. a producer of machine tools, wants to move to a larger site. Two alternative locations have been identified: Bo
    14·1 answer
  • Ann has 3/4 as many stickers as Brenda. Brenda has 2/5
    5·1 answer
  • 8. Problems and Applications Q8 Social Security benefits are increased each year in proportion to the increase in the CPI, even
    8·1 answer
  • Thanks to our group's ________________, we were able to accomplish all our goals. a. detail-oriented structure b. reaction-orien
    13·2 answers
  • Robyn rents her beach house for 60 days and uses it for personal use for 30 days during the year. The rental income is $6,000 an
    14·1 answer
  • as consumer demand for new cars increases, tire makers and steel and aluminum suppliers may experience an increase in demand for
    11·1 answer
  • Economists would describe the u.s. automobile industry as
    7·2 answers
  • In the short run, a perfectly competitive firm will maximize profits (minimize losses) by producing the level of quantity at whi
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!