These violent conflicts are, according to Neil Smelser, expressions of direct clashes of goals.
Explanation:
The purpose of the Civil Rights Movement was to advocate for greater rights and greater participation in society for African Americans. The most notable purpose of the movement was to allow people to vote as they wished, without risking their lives.
Blacks were treated poorly and with disrespect. Though they were innocent they weer not allowed to give a word against any white and they were forced to accept crime guilt even thought they were innocent of it. The whites were abandoning the rights for the African Americans but the African Americans were continuously in the struggle for many years to claim their rights and hence it was termed to be the direct clash of goals for both the parties.
Believe it or not, they nicknamed them Scalawags. I hope you found this useful :P If so please mark as brainliest lol ((:
The United States began regulating immigration soon after it won independence from Great Britain, and the laws since enacted have reflected the politics and migrant flows of the times. Early legislation tended to impose limits that favored Europeans, but a sweeping 1965 law opened doors to immigrants from other parts of the world. In more recent years, laws and presidential actions have been shaped by concerns about refugees, unauthorized immigration and terrorism.
Answer:
First Blank- Crowd
Second Blank- Family members
Third Blank- Students taking this course
Federal Government > State Government
The rationale for this is that we live in a global world and need collective responses to global challenges. Instead of there being a Utah response and a Virginia response to the need for more STEM graduates, there should be a US response. Economies of scale also come into play. It can cost less and be more efficient to have resources centralized.
State Government > Federal Government
America was founded after a revolution rejected a strong central monarchy and America needs to continue to honor that by allowing citizens in Utah to have different approaches than Virginia. When convenient, the states can choose to collectively band together on issues like defense but that should be the exception and not the rule.
