The constitution has been mentioned by many people so far. Sure. That does answer your question in a literal sense. However, which dictators throughout history have ever cared about the laws in their country?
Besides laws and the constitution, what many Canadians would be reluctant to mention is the fact that there are 38+ million people in Canada, many of whom are armed. The prime minister is just one person. Sure, they control the military, but Canada is huge! Armed civilians using guerilla tactics would be a serious challenge for Canada's military, even if they backed the would be dictator, which I think would be unlikely, especially by a majority.
Just to be clear to our southern neighbours, we don't need “the 2nd” to defend ourselves from a would be dictator. We are just fine. And we have lots of guns.
B. vernacular - the language or dialect spoken by the ordinary people in a particular country or region
Answer:
The missing options are:
A. Potential confounding variables are not always controlled din laboratory studies
.
B. Retention tests employed in laboratory studies are usually once merged with factual information rather than emotions
.
C. The intensity of emotional responses is more accurately measured after the event in laboratory studies
.
D. Memories and emotional experiences as in real life are very different from those generated in laboratory studies.
The correct answer is option D.
Explanation:
Generalizability measures how useful is what scientists have been studying in a laboratory in comparison with the real-life since the first option is a prototype of reality that can miss valuable variables that can have an impact on the real life. With generalizability, we can see if the results of the investigation and the process that scientists used are useful in real life and can apply to other things or communities. The efficiency of generalizability depends on how well the representation of reality was in the laboratory.
