Answer:
The debit to the retained earning should be $750,000 for this transaction because that is the market value of the asset to be distributed as dividend.
Explanation:
Property dividend is a form of dividend payout that involves distribution of company`s assets to equity holders as a form of return. These assets can be inventory, marketable securities or investment in a subsidiary.
For this distribution to be formal, it must be approved by the board of directors of the company. After approved and declared, the accounting entries can now be passed.
The accounting entries needed are:
Debit: Retained Earnings with the amount of the asset distributed.
Credit: Dividend Payable with the amount of the asset distributed.
It is important to note that the market value of asset to be distributed should be considered i.e the market value of the asset must be recognized in the book. The difference in book value and market value of the investment will be recognized in respective asset ledger account prior transfer to retained earnings.So that the market value of the investment is recognized on the debit side of retained earnings
In the case of Fitzgerald, $750,000 will be debited to retained earnings since it is the market value of the asset to be distributed.
I believe that the $500 cheque from your parents has already been counted when it was earned and therefore would neither increase or decrease GDP. GDP is defined basically as a bulk measure of production that is equal to the sum of all gross values of all units involved in production.
Based on the information, it can be deduced that it's an indication of the uncertainty that exists in the Vietnamese cultural model.
From the complete information, Vietnam has low points in the avoidance index. This implies that they're less associated with their cultural roots and don't have concern for hiring white people.
Some of the solutions that can be applied for training the workers include providing them with ethical and language-based training and also encourage a team culture.
Learn more about model on:
brainly.com/question/25993624
The question is reconstructed below:
Which of the following best describes a Nash equilibrium?
A. An outcome from which one or both competitors can improve their position by adopting an alternative strategy.
B. The unstable outcome of a repeated game.
C. An outcome that is stable only because of credible threats.
D. An outcome which both competitors see as optimal, given the strategy of their rival.
Answer:
D. An outcome which both competitors see as optimal, given the strategy of their rival.
Explanation:
Although Nash equilibrium is a game theory, it has been widely applied in economics. It states that a competitor can achieve his desired outcome by sticking to his original strategy. Both competitors' strategies are optimal when considering the decisions of each other.
