Answer:
a. Direct materials
b. Direct labor
c. Variable overhead
d. Fixed overhead
Explanation:
The absorption costing is the costing in which the income statement should includes all types of production cost i.e. direct material cost, direct labor cost, variable overhead and the fixed overhead
So as per the given statement, all the four types of costing should be involved while preparing the income statement under the absorption costing
Hence, all 4 options should be considered
Answer:
Option (d) is correct.
Explanation:
If there is an increase in the income taxes then as a result there is a leftward shift in the labor supply curve and we know that labor supply curve indicates the the amount of labor hours workers devoted towards the production of the goods. Hence, this will lead to a reduction in the real GDP as there will be less working hours devoted by the workers because of the higher income taxes.
Answer:
a.borrowers gain at the expense of lenders.
Explanation:
Suppose the annual rate of inflation has been 3 percent during each of the last three years and that borrowers and lenders have come to expect this rate of inflation. If the inflation rate unexpectedly rises, then borrowers gain at the expense of lenders.
As inflation increases, two things happen
1. The amount of interest paid to lenders technically becomes of smaller value and lenders are loosing while borrowers are paying lesser
2. As inflation sets in, wages are increased to compensate for inflation and since the borrower already owed money before the inflation occurred, now he or she has more money in his or her paycheck to pay off the debt.
Answer:
$74,400
Explanation:
Pell Company
Pell's income from Demers for the year ended December 31, 2010
Controlling Interest Share of Net Income for 2010- Excess Fair value Annual Amortization
Controlling Interest Share of Net Income for 2010= ($100,000 × .80) $80,000
Less Excess Fair Value Annual Amortization =($7,000 × .80) $5,600
Pell Income= $74,400
Answer: d. Entire initial investment will not be recovered.
Explanation:
The Payback period by definition is the amount of time it will take a Project to recover the initial investment into it. For example, if a project had an investment of $20 million and made $5 million every year, the Payback period would be 4 years.
Now, if the amount of time it will take to recover an investment is longer than the expected amount of time the project will run (expected useful life) then logically speaking that would mean that the Investment would not be entirely recovered because the project will be done before it can pay off the investment hence Option D is correct.
