1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
almond37 [142]
3 years ago
14

World poultry production was 77.2 million tons in the year 2004 and increasing at a continuous rate of 1.6% per year. Assume tha

t this growth rate continues.
A) Write an exponential formula for world poultry production, P, in million tons, as a function of the number of years, t, since 2004.
B) Use the formula to estimate world poultry production in the year 2013.
C) Use a graph to estimate the year in which world poultry production goes over 95 million tons.
Mathematics
1 answer:
dezoksy [38]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

A) P(t)=77.2\cdot e^{0.016t}

B) 89.157 million tons.

C) In year 2017.

Step-by-step explanation:

We have been given that world poultry production was 77.2 million tons in the year 2004 and increasing at a continuous rate of 1.6% per year.

A). We know that a continuous growth function is in form y=a\cdot e^{kx}, where,

a = Initial value,

k = Growth rate in decimal form.

1.6\%=\frac{1.6}{100}=0.016

Upon substituting our given values, we will get:

P(t)=77.2\cdot e^{0.016t}

Therefore, our required function would be P(t)=77.2\cdot e^{0.016t}, where, P represents world poultry production, in million tons, as a function of the number of years, t, since 2004.

B) To find the world poultry production in the year 2013, we will substitute t=2013-2004=9 in above formula as:

P(9)=77.2\cdot e^{0.016(9)}

P(9)=77.2\cdot e^{0.144}

P(9)=77.2\cdot 1.1548841085249135

P(9)=89.1570531781\approx 89.157

Therefore, the world poultry production in the year 2013 would be 89.157 million tons.

C) To find the number of years it will take for world poultry production to be over 95 million tons, we will equate our function with 95 as:

95=77.2\cdot e^{0.016t}

Divide both sides by 77.2:

1.2305699481865285=e^{0.016t}

Take natural log of both sides:

\text{ln}(1.2305699481865285)=\text{ln}(e^{0.016t})

\text{ln}(1.2305699481865285)=0.016t\text{ln}(e)

0.20747743456981035=0.016t*1

Divide both sides by 0.016:

t=12.9673396606

t\approx 13

Therefore, 13 years after in 2017 world poultry production goes over 95 million tons.

You might be interested in
The Basketball Boosters Club plans a pancake supper to raise $1,200. They can serve 240 people. They
wolverine [178]

\huge{ \mathfrak{  \underline{ Answer} \:  \:  ✓ }}

let the number of

  • adults be x

  • children be y

Total number of people : adults + children

  • x + y = 240

  • x = 240 - y - [1]

Total money earned from adults :

  • 6 × x = 6x

Total money earned from children :

  • 2 × y = 2y

Therefore, total money = money earned from each Adult and children.

  • 6x + 2y = 1200 -[2]

Now, let's plug the value of x from equation [1] into equation [2]

  • 6 (240 - y) + 2y = 1200

  • 1440 - 6y + 2y = 1200

  • -4y = 1200 - 1440

  • -4y = - 240

  • y = 60

let's plug the value of y in equation [1]

  • x = 240 - y

  • x = 240 - 60

  • x = 180

Hence, we get :

  • total adults = x = 180

  • total children = y = 60

Correct option is C

_____________________________

\mathrm{ ☠ \: TeeNForeveR \: ☠}

7 0
3 years ago
The elevation of city A is 80 feet below sea level; the elevation of city C is 16 feet below sea level. The elevation of city D
Ipatiy [6.2K]
Part A: -16 divided by 1/2 =D
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
3 + 10.8 is:<br> rational<br> irrational<br> Idk what this is if u could please help me
ratelena [41]

Answer:

3 + 10.8 is : rational.

Step-by-step explanation:

the reason for this is because it is neither a variable, pi, or numbers like square root 2.

4 0
3 years ago
Look at the diagram, how do you know that y is not directly proportional to x.
lesya [120]

Step-by-step explanation:

If y was directly proportional to x, the graph of y against x would pass through the origin (O).

Since the graph above does not show this, y is not directly proportional to x.

7 0
3 years ago
HELP HURRY
WINSTONCH [101]
The first option is the answer, it is going from P to Q so the only logical answer would be the first choice
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Write a reciprocal function with asymptotes x=4 and y=-9.
    7·1 answer
  • Ken said that he is going to reduce the number of calories that he eats during the day. Ken's trainer asked him to start off sma
    5·1 answer
  • What is the value of (3/4)^3?
    13·1 answer
  • Rewrite 18/14 in simplest form
    13·2 answers
  • 5x + 3y when x = 3.2 and y = 5​
    14·2 answers
  • 12 - (-4) = ? AND how do I solve it?
    6·2 answers
  • Solve for x. 1n(5x-3)=2
    9·2 answers
  • 0.05 is 1/10 the value of <br>A. 5 <br>B. 0.005<br>C. 0.5 <br>D. 50<br>​
    12·1 answer
  • Abby has $200 in a savings account that earns 5% annually. The interest is not compounded, but simple interest. How much money w
    10·1 answer
  • 3 less than a number is 17
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!