You have the answer if you just do a little bit more but other than that you have your answer
I really sorry I have to do this I'm in a test I need help
No; just because there is a correlation does not prove causation.
The correlation says that as the amount of rainfall increases, the amount of oranges produced increases as well. It does not state what causes it.
Because it is like having a unit of measurement that is set
lets say that in a certain country, one serving of bread is 1/2 of the standard loaf
and if you have 3 servings, you have 3/2 loaf so the bottom number tells you how many parts out of 1 whole you have
Answer:
<em>A</em>(-3, 6), <em>B</em>(-1, -2), <em>C</em>(-7, 1)
Step-by-step explanation:
To the pre-image after a 270°-counterclockwise rotation [90°-clockwise rotation], just reverse it by doing a 270°-clockwise rotation [90°-counterclockwise rotation]:
Extended Rotation Rules
- 270°-clockwise rotation [90°-counterclockwise rotation] >> (x, y) → (-y, x)
- 270°-counterclockwise rotation [90°-clockwise rotation] >> (x, y) → (y, -x)
- 180°-rotation >> (x, y) → (-x, -y)
So, perform your rotation:
270°-clockwise rotation [90°-counterclockwise rotation] → <em>C</em><em>'</em>[1, 7] was originally at <em>C</em>[-7, 1]
→ <em>B'</em>[-2, 1] was originally at <em>B</em>[-1, -2]
→ <em>A</em><em>'</em>[6, 3] was originally at <em>A</em>[-3, 6]
I am joyous to assist you anytime.
